Real Eigen Values: Proving/Disproving Matrix AB

  • Thread starter Thread starter asisbanerjee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigen values
asisbanerjee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need to either prove or disprove by a counterexample the following proposition:
" Let A be an m by n row-stochastic matrix in which all entries are positive real numbers and let B be an n by m column-stochastic matrix with the same feature. Then all eigen values of the m by m matrix AB are real."
Can anyone help? It may be noted that AB is not necessarily symmetric (Hermitian).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
asisbanerjee said:
I need to either prove or disprove by a counterexample the following proposition:
" Let A be an m by n row-stochastic matrix in which all entries are positive and let B be an n by m column-stochastic matrix with the same feature. Then all eigen values of the m by m matrix AB are real."
Can anyone help?

Hello asisbanerjee and welcome to the forums.

Maybe this will give you a headstart:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive-definite_matrix
 
asisbanerjee said:
I need to either prove or disprove by a counterexample the following proposition:
" Let A be an m by n row-stochastic matrix in which all entries are positive real numbers and let B be an n by m column-stochastic matrix with the same feature. Then all eigen values of the m by m matrix AB are real."
Can anyone help? It may be noted that AB is not necessarily symmetric (Hermitian).
Do you know an example of a (square) stochastic matrix A whose entries are positive but which has a nonreal eigenvalue?

That's enough to find a counterexample, because you can then take B=...
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top