Real gas tables: isentropic work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges faced while developing a Matlab program for calculating thermodynamic properties of dry air using real gas tables, primarily from Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook. The user identifies potential inaccuracies in the tables, particularly concerning heat capacity and enthalpy, which lead to inconsistent results when calculating isentropic work. Multiple methods attempted for calculating this work yield varying results, indicating a need for more reliable data. Recommendations include acquiring better thermodynamic property databases, such as NIST's REFPROP, which can enhance accuracy. Ultimately, the user finds that using more precise data resolves the issues encountered.
kandelabr
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I am writing a Matlab program for calculating properties and processes of dry air using real gas tables. The only tables I could find were from Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook (7th edition, 1999).
Mostly I make use of cubic interpolation and in some critical cases numerical differentiation and integration of thermodynamic equations (for instance, calculating entropy from equation of state and cp tables).

First, I think I found a few mistakes in the tables and I guess there is even more of them.
This is a surface plot of cp (heat capacity at constant pressure); temperature 240-500 K and pressure 1 – 500 bar:

rawcp.jpg


If I filter the peak out and correct the two values where graph doesn't rise continuously (using interpolation), I get this:

intcp.jpg


But, if I calculate cp using equation cp = dh/dT (I also have an enthalpy table), the surface looks like this:

dhcp.jpg


Now there must be something wrong either with enthalpy table or cp table or with whatever table;
Second, I cannot calculate isentropic work of gas.
I am given the temperature and pressure at the beginning (T1, p1), and volume ratio (vr = v2/v1) (I am using volume ratio because I am developing a volumetric expander).

I tried 6 (six!) different approaches (I can post the code of all of them, If you want), but the results are definitely wrong since every method gives different results for the same start parameters.

The following graph shows work for T1 = 400K, vr = 2 and p1 goes from 15 bar to 500 bar.
The red method uses only equation of state (ideal gas equation and interpolation of factor of compressibility from tables) and a heap of numerical equation solving.
The blue is the most brutal way, which means using a while loop to add up temperatures bit by bit until the desired volume is reached.
Work of ideal gas would be drawn as a horizontal line at around 7x104 J/kg. Keep in mind that this is not one expansion but a series of expansions, each starting at a different pressure p1, which is on horizontal axis.

wbe.jpg


This seems like a total nonsense. If it is of any help, this is the final temperature after expansions:

Tbe.jpg


So, my options are few:
- acquire better data from somewhere
- invent yet another method of calculating isentropic work (seems not a very good idea).

So, do you know where could I get thermodynamic properties of dry air? I only need volumes and specific heats (other tables would be welcome, though). Accuracy is critical!

Thank you,
kandelabr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hardly believe there is no one who has ever worked with real gases. How do you build a high pressure compressor? A diving cylinder? An air gun?
Using ideal gas and miss the numbers by 40%?

It's not only these forums. I can't find any data on the net (except that book), there is no book in our library (which is not too small), no real gas equations-of-state coefficients (Redlich-Kwong, Benedict-Webb-Rubin, virial equations), nothing, nothing. I feel like I was doing some basic research.
 
kandelabr said:
I hardly believe there is no one who has ever worked with real gases. How do you build a high pressure compressor? A diving cylinder? An air gun?
Using ideal gas and miss the numbers by 40%?

It's not only these forums. I can't find any data on the net (except that book), there is no book in our library (which is not too small), no real gas equations-of-state coefficients (Redlich-Kwong, Benedict-Webb-Rubin, virial equations), nothing, nothing. I feel like I was doing some basic research.
Hi kandelabr,
The company I work for has their own thermophysical fluids database and I'm sure many other companies do also. But you can purchase a database from NIST called REFPROP for $200 or $300.
http://www.nist.gov/srd/nist23.cfm

I've used it and it's very similar to the one we have. You can link it to EXCEL and I believe to Matlab too, but I haven't used it with Matlab.
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div838/theory/refprop/Frequently_asked_questions.htm#MatLabApplications
 
Thank you for your answer!
Got it!

(no further questions)
 
Last edited:
Just FYI: it was the data. the same code on more precise tables works very well.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top