Real photo of an atom or maybe quark?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nerubz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Photo Quark
AI Thread Summary
Real photographs of atoms or quarks do not exist; instead, scientists use advanced imaging techniques like scanning tunneling microscopy to create visual representations. These images are not traditional photographs but rather detailed 3D representations that illustrate atomic structures. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using accurate scientific visuals for educational presentations. Participants suggest searching specifically for scanning tunneling microscope images to find suitable visuals. Ultimately, while true photographs of atoms are unattainable, there are high-quality representations available for academic use.
nerubz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm making a sort of physics presentation because I'm graduating high-school soon and my physics so far sucks and the low grades won't let me go in university... anyway I need to make it look more scientific, not like an illustrated book for kids. That's why I need some REAL photos of atoms, molecules (quarks would be awesome). But please, only real photos, not drawing, 3d animation etc etc.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've been Google-ing for a freaking day and I couldn't find anything. You are my last hope :)


P.S. I'm not really sure that such photos exist, but I had to ask
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you've been googling all day for nothing. there are no photographs of atoms. There are 3D representations of atoms from scanning tunneling electron microscopes and the likes.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Other How much does GPA and Prestigious school indicate success?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Background study of molecular/atomic bonds needs clarification
Replies
1
Views
2K
What experiments conclusively demonstrated atomic structure as we know it today?
Replies
1
Views
657
B How many gluons on average are there in a proton at once?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Conservation of energy for a collision
Replies
9
Views
3K
Misc. Interference Between Two Speakers -- Real Life Version of a HW problem
Replies
18
Views
5K
I could really use some help picking my optional module [GameDev]
Replies
2
Views
2K
A In light of new evidence, what might be behind the Casimir Effect?
Replies
46
Views
4K
A Question about proof of Great Picard Theorem
Replies
3
Views
2K
Increasing/decreasing complexity (just a weird theory)
Replies
23
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top