Real Roots of Exponential Equation (Involves Quadratic)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the real roots of the quadratic equation y^2 - 3y + k = 0 and the implications of the parameter k. It is established that for real solutions, the condition 9 + 4k ≥ 0 must hold, leading to the roots y1 and y2. The focus is primarily on y2, as it represents the larger root and is guaranteed to be positive for k ≥ -9/4, while y1 may yield negative values depending on k. The conclusion is that for k ≥ -9/4, y2 is the only relevant solution, while y1 can be disregarded unless k is specifically in the range -9/4 < k < 0. Thus, the final answer emphasizes that only y2 is necessary for the problem's requirements.
seniorhs9
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi. I actually understand most of this question, but not the parts in red.

Question.

[PLAIN]http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/7237/2008testhphysf.jpg

If above doesn't load, please go to http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/7237/2008testhphysf.jpg

Homework Equations



The roots of a quadratic equation are real when b^2 - 4ac \geq 0


The Attempt at a Solution



Because we want real solutions, we have...

b^2 - 4ac \geq 0 so 9 + 4k \geq 0 =&gt; \sqrt{9 + 4k} \geq 0 .

But y^2 - 3y + k = 0 has two solutions...

y_1 = \frac{1}{2}(3 - \sqrt{9 + 4k}

y_2 = \frac{1}{2}(3 + \sqrt{9 + 4k}

I get that 9 + 4k \geq 0 means y_2 is true, but what about y_1?

The solution cares about "the larger root". Ie y_2. But why doesn't it care about y_1? I mean, both y_1, y_2 are solutions?

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your attachment isn't coming through.
 
Context? Sometimes, when you're dealing with time problems, you'll get a positive and negative root, but since a negative time isn't valid, you'll just take the positive root.

However, if you're just given the equation:

y^2 -3y + k = 0

You are correct in saying that y1 and y2 are distinct real roots (assuming that 9+4k > 0).
 
Hi. I think I fixed my original post. The picture loads now.

gb7nash. Thanks for your answer. But this question and the test don't give any context for x so I still don't see why the solution doesn't care about the negative root?
 
Ok, I can see the image now.

Originally, we substitute y = 3x and we want to solve for y. Think about it for a second. Is there any way y can be negative? Is 3 raised to any power of x a negative number?

Knowing this now...
 
Hi gb7nash. Thanks for your answer.

Actually, I understand why 3^x &gt; 0 for all x.

But my question is on how y_1 = \frac{1}{2}(3 - \sqrt{9 + 4k}) goes with the above.

We don't know 3 - \sqrt{9 + 4k} &gt; 0

We only know \sqrt{9 + 4k} \geq 0?
 
You're exactly right. Depending on what value you choose for k, y1 may be positive or negative. For instance, for k = 10 you'll obtain a negative value for y1 (which is nonsense, since y cannot equal a negative number). For k = 0, you'll obtain a positive value for y1.

Since this is the case, we can't always rely on y1 to give a valid root, since there is the possibility of it being negative. However, y2 will always give a positive number (for k >= -9/4) and a valid root.
 
Hi gb7nash. Thanks for your answer.

So are you saying the only final answer to this question is just y2, GIVEN \sqrt{9 + 4k} \geq 0?

I should toss out y1, since 9 + 4k \geq 0 for this problem, because like we just talked about, y1 isn't always > 0 if 9 + 4k \geq 0?

So just to make sure, y2 = 3x, GIVEN \sqrt{9 + 4k} \geq 0. AND it is WRONG to write y = 3x as final answer, if 9 + 4k \geq 0.
 
Last edited:
seniorhs9 said:
So are you saying the only final answer to this question is just y2?

No. A certain range of k makes y1 valid. What must k be to make y1 positive?
 
  • #10
Hi gb7nash. Thanks for your answer.

I edited my second last post because I actually didn't specify requirement 9 + 4k \geq 0 for this problem. Now did I get everything right?

But to answer your question, y1 > 0 if 3 - \sqrt{9 + 4k} &gt; 0 &lt;=&gt; \sqrt{9 + 4k} &lt; 3 &lt;=&gt; k &lt; 0. But this isn't what we want for this question. Because if k < -9/4, original equation won't have real roots.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
No, y1 > 0 if:

\sqrt{9+4k} &lt; 3

Solving for k, what do you get?

Also, you want 9+4k > 0 in order to obtain a real root. Solve for k again.

Combining these, what must k be between to have two roots?
 
  • #12
Hi gb7nash. Thanks for your answer.

I actually meant to write 3 - \sqrt{9 + 4k} &gt; 0 so I've fixed this.

Because 3x = y > 0, the asked exponential question has AT LEAST two roots if

k < 0 and k > -9/4 <=> -9/4 < k < 0.

But I just want to make sure. The question asks "one or more real solutions", so isn't k \geq -9/4 enough?

This'd mean that it's enough to have y2 as the solution? y1 isn't necessary? Because "one" real solution's enough? Or is the answer wrong?
 
  • #13
seniorhs9 said:
But I just want to make sure. The question asks "one or more real solutions", so isn't k \geq -9/4 enough?

Yes. If k >= -9/4, we can guarantee that we'll have one or two real roots (depending on if k is between -9/4 and 0, or greater than 0). I interpret one or more to mean that they want both cases covered, so k >= -9/4 gives you what you need.
 
  • #14
Hi gb7nash. Thank you so much for your answers.

So again, just to make sure, for only one real root, then

only y2 = \frac{1}{2}(3 + \sqrt{9 + 4k} is a solution

so only y2 = 3x.

y1 = \frac{1}{2}(3 - \sqrt{9 + 4k} is NOT a solution. I just want to make sure because I was confused about this.
 
  • #15
It depends on the value of k. As stated before, y1 and y2 are solutions for -9/4 <= k < 0, and only y2 is a solution for k >= 0. Since this is the case, a) is what you're looking for.
 
Back
Top