Real scalar field , Action, variation, deriving EoM

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
## L(x) = L(\phi(x), \partial_{u} \phi (x) ) = -1/2 (m^{2} \phi ^{2}(x) + \partial_{u} \phi(x) \partial^{u} \phi (x))## , the Lagrange density.
## S= \int d^{4}(x) L (x) ##, the action.

## \phi -> \phi + \delta \phi ## (just shortened the notation and dropped the x dependence)

I have ## \delta S = \int d^{4} x ( -1/2( \delta (m^{2} \phi ^{2}) + \delta (\partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} \phi )) =0 ## last equality by principle of least action .

I have ##\delta (m^{2} \phi ^{2}) = m^{2} \phi \delta \phi ## , which is fine.

I'm having problems with the next term:

##\delta (\partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} \phi )) = \delta (\partial_{u} \phi ) \partial^{u} \phi + \partial_{u} \phi \delta ( \partial^{u} \phi ) ##

I need to show that is equal to ##\partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} (\delta \phi) ## I am then fine with the rest of the derivation, which involves doing integration by parts on this term to 'change' ## \partial^{u} (\delta \phi) ## to ##\delta \phi## and then loosing this arbitrary variation in ##\phi## to get the equations of motion.

I am clueless how to get ## \delta (\partial_{u} \phi ) \partial^{u} \phi + \partial_{u} \phi \delta ( \partial^{u} \phi ) = \partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} (\delta \phi) ##, any tips getting starting greatly appreciated.

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
I have δ(m2ϕ2)=m2ϕδϕδ(m2ϕ2)=m2ϕδϕ\delta (m^{2} \phi ^{2}) = m^{2} \phi \delta \phi , which is fine
This is not fine, you are missing a factor of two. You are also missing the same factor of two in the other relation.

Try to use this to figure out how to solve your problem.
 
Orodruin said:
This is not fine, you are missing a factor of two. You are also missing the same factor of two in the other relation.

Try to use this to figure out how to solve your problem.

apologies that was a typo, well it cancels with the 1/2 anyway.
I don't see how it sheds any light on the issue I stated - the variation is acting separately on ##\partial_{u}## and ##\partial^{u}##.
I think that ## \delta ( \partial_{u} \phi ) = \delta \phi' ##, were ##\phi' = \partial x_{u} \phi ##, but I don't know what is ##partial^{u} \phi ##, actually...what is ## \partial^{u} ## ? , ##\partial_{u} x = \partial / \partial x^{u} ## and ##\partial x^{u} ## can be attained by raising a index in this? but I don't really know what it is, so I don't know what ##partial^{u} \phi ## is.

Many thanks
 
it's okay got it. thanks for the help guys :thumbup: