Real Variables: Measurability of {x: x∈An i.o.}

  • Thread starter Thread starter glacier302
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the measurability of the set E = {x: x∈An i.o.}, where An is a sequence of measurable sets. It is established that E is a measurable set, and if the sum of the measures of the sets An is finite (∑m(An) < ∞), then the measure of E is zero (m(E) = 0). The approach involves defining a measure on E using the individual measures of the sets An, specifically through the function μ_E(x) := ∑_{n | x ∈ A_n} μ_n(x).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measurable sets and their properties
  • Familiarity with measure theory concepts, particularly Lebesgue measure
  • Knowledge of sequences and limits in mathematical analysis
  • Ability to work with infinite series and their convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of measurable sets in measure theory
  • Learn about Lebesgue measure and its applications in real analysis
  • Explore the concept of countable unions and intersections of sets
  • Investigate the implications of the Borel-Cantelli lemma in probability theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of measure theory, and anyone studying real analysis or probability theory will benefit from this discussion.

glacier302
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let An, n = 1,2,..., be a sequence of measurable sets. Let E = {x: x∈An i.o.}.

(a) Prove that E is a measurable set.

(b) Prove that m(E) = 0 if ∑m(An) < ∞


Homework Equations



A point x is said to be in An infinitely often (i.o.) if there is an infinite sequence of integers n1<n2<... such that x∈Ank for every k.


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really not sure where to start with part (a). For part (b), if ∑m(An) < ∞
then E is countable, therefore m(E) = 0...I can't really explain why E is countable, though, it's just an instinct.

Any hints would be greatly appreciated : )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My first instinct would be to try and explicitly define the measure on E.
Each A_n comes with its own measure \mu_n so you could try something like
\mu_E(x) := \sum_{n \mid x \in A_n} \mu_n(x)
and check that it is a measure.
 
I think I figured it out. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K