Rearranging terms in Trig equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter PTX-14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms Trig
PTX-14
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was reading on planetary motion and have gotten hung up on a "rearrangement of terms" that the author skimmed over. It reads that:

r=e(k+rcos(θ))=(ek)/(1-ecos(θ))

It's been a while since I've been in a math class: I just can't follow how to get from a to b. Is there anyone who can walk me through this like I'm twelve?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Put all the terms including r on the left hand side and then factor out the r. It might help you to multiply out the brackets on the right hand side first:

\begin{equation}
r = e\left(k + r\cos \theta\right) = ek + er\cos \theta
\end{equation}
 
Try getting all the "r" terms onto one side of the equation first. That is, try [strike]adding[/strike] subtracting e\, r\, \cos(\theta) to both sides.
 
Last edited:
uart said:
That is, try adding r\, e\, \cos(\theta) to both sides.

You mean subtracting, surely.
 
Nylex said:
You mean subtracting, surely.
Um yeah. Add the negative. ;)

BTW. We both posted at the same time. :)
 
Thank you two, I guess it's time for me to go back and audit some pre-algebra classes... :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top