Rearrangement of the First Law of Thermodynamics

In summary, the student is struggling with the algebraic portion of the problem and is looking for help from others. He has been successful in solving the problem up to this point, but needs help with the last step.
  • #1
HethensEnd25
28
0
Please post this type of questions in HW section using the template for showing your work.
For class we have been asked to show how the first law of thermodynamics

dU=dQ+dW

can be shown to be

dQ=(CV/R)*VdP +(Cp/R)*PdV

I have an answer, but am hesitant to say it is a final answer.

I will admit that while doing the problem I had trouble following what I was doing. Hence my posting the question. It seemed to me that because we know how state functions act and change with certain processes that much of the problem is a more of a "plug and chug" approach.

But I am concerned with the partial derivatives when rearranging this equation. How do certain parts cancel out or how does one approach the problem without them? Is it safe to assume that since you know how the state variables will act in a certain process that you can use that knowledge to provide a better or more exact answer to the problem?Attached you will find a picture of the problem that I have done to the best of my ability (which is limited I must say)

If anyone can provide an explanation as to why certain things are done the way they are or correct my dissection of this problem I would be grateful for your time in the matter.

Best Regards,

D
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1303.JPG
    IMG_1303.JPG
    33.9 KB · Views: 658
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
assuming a closed system!**
 
  • #3
I'm working on it, but I haven't been able to solve it yet. Let's see what you've done so far.
 
  • #4
Correct me if I'm wrong but, if there is an R in the equation, this analysis must be specific to an ideal gas.
 
  • #5
Yes you are correct. The assumption is that it is an ideal gas and a closed system.

attached find my answer thus far for the problem. I am still working out the last step holding T as a constant T=T(V,P)
image1.JPG
image2.JPG
 
  • #6
This equation can not be applied in general because it can't describe the amount of heat transferred to an incompressible solid or liquid at constant pressure. For these cases, it would predict that dQ=0 (which is not necessarily correct). If it is not generic, it also cannot describe real gases beyond the ideal gas region. Therefore, the equation must apply exclusively to an ideal gas. The presence of the ideal gas constant R in the equation is a dead giveaway.

For a reversible path, $$dQ=TdS=C_vdT+PdV$$But, for an ideal gas, $$dT=\frac{PdV+VdP}{R}$$Therefore, $$dQ==C_v\frac{PdV+VdP}{R}+PdV=\frac{C_v}{R}VdP+\frac{(C_v+R)}{R}PdV$$But, for an ideal gas, $$C_v+R=C_p$$Therefore, $$dQ=\frac{C_v}{R}VdP+\frac{C_p}{R}PdV$$This equation applies only to an ideal gas and a reversible path.
 
  • #7
Chestermiller said:
dQ==Cv(PdV+VdP)/R+PdV=(Cv/R)*VdP+((Cv+R)/R)*PdV

for this part in particular how are you rearranging the terms of the ideal gas equation to get the end result algebraically?

I am most curious about the Cv+R that is obtained in the end result

I know that Cp=dU/dT +R=Cv+R

So would I simply just rearrange with T as a function of PV/R ?

I appreciate your clarification! I will continue to work the problem till I have the end result.

Best Regards,

D
 
  • #8
HethensEnd25 said:
for this part in particular how are you rearranging the terms of the ideal gas equation to get the end result algebraically?
I'm just starting with the usual form of the first law and using the product rule to get dT in terms of dP and dV. The rest is easy.
I am most curious about the Cv+R that is obtained in the end result

I know that Cp=dU/dT +R=Cv+R
Yes. This is the substitution I made to get the final equation
So would I simply just rearrange with T as a function of PV/R ?
Yes. The idea is to eliminate dT by expressing dT in terms of dP and dV
 
  • Like
Likes HethensEnd25
  • #9
Thank you sir for the affirmation! My question has been answered for this particular problem.

It has been much appreciated.
 

1. How is the first law of thermodynamics rearranged?

The first law of thermodynamics, also known as the law of conservation of energy, is typically rearranged in the form of: ΔU = Q - W, where ΔU represents the change in internal energy, Q represents the heat transferred to the system, and W represents the work done by the system.

2. Why is it necessary to rearrange the first law of thermodynamics?

Rearranging the first law of thermodynamics allows us to solve for different variables and better understand the energy flow in a system. It also helps to simplify certain calculations and make them more manageable.

3. Can the first law of thermodynamics be applied to all systems?

Yes, the first law of thermodynamics is a fundamental law of nature and applies to all physical systems, regardless of their size or complexity.

4. How does the rearrangement of the first law of thermodynamics relate to real-world applications?

Rearranging the first law of thermodynamics allows us to analyze and understand the energy changes in various real-world processes, such as power plants, engines, and refrigeration systems. It also helps engineers and scientists to design more efficient and sustainable systems.

5. Are there any limitations to the rearrangement of the first law of thermodynamics?

While the rearrangement of the first law of thermodynamics is a useful tool for understanding energy flow, it does have limitations. It assumes that the system is in a steady state and that there are no energy losses due to friction or other factors. In reality, these assumptions may not always hold true, and thus, the results obtained from the rearranged form of the law may not be entirely accurate.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
642
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
702
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
976
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
849
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top