Reason for: Temperature is proportional to atomic motio

AI Thread Summary
Increasing temperature is correlated with increased atomic motion, as supported by the kinetic theory of gases, which states that gas pressure rises with temperature due to faster-moving molecules impacting the container walls. The discussion highlights the challenge some individuals face in accepting this relationship, despite the experimental evidence. The analogy of particles connected by springs helps illustrate how temperature relates to the speed of atomic movement. Understanding temperature and atomic motion often requires a gradual progression in physics education. Overall, the connection between temperature and atomic motion is well-established, though it may initially seem counterintuitive to some.
mooncrater
Messages
215
Reaction score
18
Yeah... I know many of you people might be laughing but still I don't understand how can we simply reach the conclusion that increasing temperature increases the atomic motion.
Consider this :
When we push something, it moves (don't over think about this one) when we apply torque on something, it rotates, though it's generally accepted but still its absurd to me that increasing temperature increases the atomic motion.
One may say that:
" By conservation of energy, we can say that the energy supplied by the increase in temperature equals to the kinetic energy of the particles "
But this doesn't just satisfy me. Does anyone else has another explanation?
 
Science news on Phys.org
mooncrater said:
One may say that:
" By conservation of energy, we can say that the energy supplied by the increase in temperature equals to the kinetic energy of the particles "
But this doesn't just satisfy me. Does anyone else has another explanation?
Which part of this explanation bothers you ?
 
I have an explanation but you have to start with matter consisting of three little particles connected by springs and then think of temperature in a purely analogous manner of how fast those particles bounce on the springs.
 
There's nothing laughable about your question. One's understanding of temperature advances in stages as one studies Physics. Are you comfortable with (i) the experimental fact that (for a fixed mass of gas in a container of constant volume) the gas pressure increases with temperature (as read by an ordinary thermometer) (ii) the kinetic theory, including the idea that gas pressure is caused by the impact of gas molecules with the container wall? If so, it's difficult to avoid the inference that an increased temperature is correlated with increased speed (and therefore increased mean kinetic energy) of the gas molecules. Note that I don't say that the rise in temperature causes the gas molecules to have increased mean KE, just that there is a corrrelation.

Has this helped?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mooncrater
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top