Recent Fuego Eruption: VEI and SO2 Mass Ejected

  • Thread starter fizzy
  • Start date
In summary, the Smithsonian quote from Simon Carn stating that the SO2 mass ejected during the Fuego volcano eruption in 2018 was 2 orders of magnitude less than the 1974 eruption, was misquoted and caused confusion. The Fuego eruption peaked at 5 kilotons on June 3rd and there is still no information on its VEI. This eruption was not as significant as El Chichon or Mt. Pinatubo, with a possible VEI of 4. It was a shorter blast with a high SO2 emission, compared to the longer but smaller 1974 eruption. The lack of a major stratospheric event like this is a shame, as it would provide valuable information on the long term
  • #1
fizzy
193
17
This quote from Smithsonian seems to have messed up and is senseless.
"SO2 mass ejected was about~2 orders of magnitude than the 1974 eruption"
https://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=342090

Does anyone know whether it was bigger or smaller. Kinda important when you're talking about two orders of magnitude !

Also I have not been able to find any authoritative statement of the energy of the blast on the VEI scale. Any ideas?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
current
https://so2.gsfc.nasa.gov/pix/daily/0618/centam_so2pca_trm_ts_plot.html

I can't find anything for 1974. I don't think there were any really accurate ways to measure emission amounts back in 1974.
Unlike these days with the very sophisticated Earth atmosphere monitoring satellites in orbit.

The problem is …. Simon Carn was either miss-quoted or he can't write a coherent sentence …… the words greater or lesser were
omitted from the sentence. The way it is written seems to infer "greater" ??

I loved to comments, by a guy called Trevor, on this site ……

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/06...re-may-induce-some-short-term-global-cooling/

“According to Simon Carn, satellite data analysis ………………”
.
“He went on to note that the SO2 mass was about ~2 orders of magnitude than the 1974 eruption, which had a significant stratospheric impact. ”
.
IF……. SIMON CARN…….is………..their………….”SPOKESPERSON”
AND he can’t manage to CLEARLY ARTICULATE A SINGLE SENTENCE
without causing SO MUCH CONFUSION , then it speaks volumes about
the garbled THOUGHT PROCESSES engaged ( or not ! ) and
the poor CHOICE and QUALITY of SCIENTISTS that are involved in
informing the PUBLIC on such matters.
NO WONDER that “everyone said it took them by surprise” !
HE may well have been engaged to keep them informed ,and even
have done so , BUT in an unintelligible form.?
ANYWAY , what is 2 magnitudes either way ?
WHO CAN TELL ? OBVIOUSLY NOT Simon Carn !
Possibly Nick Stokes’ reasoning is correct ! ( or ?? nah ! )
Possibly John M ( Beware ! ) Ware has nailed it !?
Anyway……..it’s a good thing that Guatemala is a LONG WAY AWAY
from me !
Dave
 
  • #3
OK found something that looks reasonable

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02596975

Volcán Fuego in the Central American Republic of Guatemala erupted violently in October, 1974. A remote sensing correlation spectrometer. COSPEC IV, which utilizes the characteristic molecular absorption of SO2 in the ultraviolet was used to monitor the SO2 content of the volcanic plume. Over a 60-day period measurements were made on 37 days between and following major eruptive phases. SO2 emission rates corrected for atmospheric scattering of the spectral signal average 423 metric tons/day with a standard deviation of 252 metric tons/days. Late stage peaks in SO2 emission at Fuego are consistent with the presence of anomalously high contents of soluble materials on the stratigraphically highest ashes from other Central American eruptions. Indications are that the SO2 concentration within the volcanic plume increased as activity waned. These features imply that remote spectroscopic sensing of SO2 and perhaps other gases in a volcanic plume may provide a relatively easy and inexpensive means of determining the cessation of violent eruptive activity.

Where as for the 2018 eruption it peaked at ~ 5 kilotons for the 3rd June

D
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Ah, thanks for the WUWT link. Nick Stokes provides a link to what was presumably the original, misquoted by Smithsonian.
https://twitter.com/simoncarn/status/1003645271715311617

Apparently simply quoting what he actually wrote was too simple for Smithsonian. They had to try to paraphrase it for us ... and turned it into nonsense. Probably an arts major doing media studies who wrote the press release.

... so it's 2 order LESS. Not a major event. Still no news on VEI, though it does not seem to be on the same scale and El Chichon or Mt Pinatubo.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #5
fizzy said:
... so it's 2 order LESS. Not a major event.

the only significance is that it was mainly a 1 or 2 day blast with a really high SO2 emission
whereas the 1974 eruption went on for a couple of months. Must smaller daily releases but an overall much
larger total output
fizzy said:
Still no news on VEI, though it does not seem to be on the same scale and El Chichon or Mt Pinatubo.
yeah, somewhere around a VEI of 4Dave
 
  • #6
Thanks Dave. With all due deference to the safety of those who live near these monsters, it's a shame. We need another major stratospheric event with the current levels of observation to better understand their long term effects. I thought this might have been it. Mt. Agung was making serious rumblings for a while and scared everyone away but then failed to deliver. We'll just have to wait a bit longer.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn

1. What is VEI and how is it determined?

VEI stands for Volcanic Explosivity Index and it is a scale used to measure the intensity and size of volcanic eruptions. It is determined by measuring the volume of erupted material, the height of the eruption column, and the duration of the eruption.

2. What is the VEI of the recent Fuego eruption?

The recent eruption of Fuego in June 2018 was classified as a VEI 3 eruption. This means that it was a moderate to large eruption, with a column height of 5-15 km and an erupted volume of 0.01-0.1 km3.

3. How does the VEI of the recent Fuego eruption compare to previous eruptions?

The VEI of the recent Fuego eruption is similar to the VEI 3 eruptions that occurred in 2012 and 2015. However, it is significantly smaller than the VEI 5 eruption that occurred in 1974.

4. Can the VEI of a volcanic eruption change over time?

Yes, the VEI of a volcanic eruption can change over time. For example, the 1974 eruption of Fuego was initially classified as a VEI 4, but was later downgraded to a VEI 3 after further analysis and data collection.

5. Is the VEI of a volcanic eruption the only factor that determines its impact?

No, the VEI of a volcanic eruption is just one factor that determines its impact. Other factors such as the location of the volcano, the type of eruption, and the presence of populated areas also play a significant role in the overall impact of an eruption.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
135
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
595
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top