Reciprocal Function is Unbounded

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Let ##f : (0,\infty) \to \Bbb{R} - \{0\}##. If ##\frac{1}{f}## is unbounded on every interval containing ##x=3##, will ##\lim_{x \to 3} f(x) = 0##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Consider the function

$$f(x) = \begin{cases} 1, & x \in \Bbb{Q} \cap (0,\infty) \\ x-3, & x \notin \Bbb{Q} \cap (0, \infty) \\ \end{cases}$$

Let ##x_n \notin \Bbb{Q} \cap (0,\infty)## be an irrational sequence converging to ##3##. Then ##\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{f(x_n)} = \lim_{n \to 3} \frac{1}{x_n -3} = \pm \infty## (I am abusing notation out of laziness). This shows that ##\frac{1}{f}## is unbounded on every interval of containing ##3##. Now let ##r_n \in \Bbb{Q} \cap (0, \infty)## be a rational sequence converging to ##3##. Then ##\lim_{n \to \infty} f(r_n) = \lim_{n \to \infty} 1 = 1 \neq 0##.

How does this sound? What if ##f## is required to be continuous; will the theorem hold?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes that is correct. If ##f## is continuous the theorem will not hold - although that needs to be proven.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top