Recirculating DE Mixture Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter The0wn4g3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving a rigid tank with saltwater and the dynamics of concentration changes due to inflow and outflow rates. The initial attempt at solving the differential equation for concentration change was flawed, as it did not account for the tank's volume. The corrected equation includes the volume in the outflow calculation, leading to a more accurate representation of concentration dynamics. After applying randomly chosen values, the results appear reasonable, prompting the user to seek validation of their solution. The conversation highlights the importance of incorporating all relevant factors in differential equations for accurate modeling.
The0wn4g3
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rigid tank of volume "V" contains salt dissolved in water at a concentration "C". Fresh water flows into the tank at a rate of "F". A fraction "x" of the exit flow is recirculated back into the entrance flow.

Given:
V, Volume of tank
Fin, Flow rate in
Fo, Flow rate out
x, Fraction of volume flow-rate recirculated
Co, Initial concentration
C(t), Concentration in tank at time t

img002.jpg


Homework Equations



\frac{dC}{dt}=\text{concentration of salt entering}-\text{concentration of salt leaving}

C_{in}=xFC(t)

C_{out}=(1-x)FC(t)

so \frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-(1-x)FC(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-(1-x)FC(t)

When I plot this using Euler's Method, I get this graph. This is obviously incorrect, because it does not reflect exponential decay. Can someone help me out? I'm really not sure what I've done wrong.
untitled.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I may have found my own mistake. I totally forgot to take into account to volume of the tank. I believe this wound change the Flow Out equation to:

<br /> C_{out}=(1-x)FC(t)<br />

so the final equation would be:

<br /> \frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-\frac{(1-x)FC(t)}{V}<br />

is this correct?

With some randomly chosen values (V=10,000 ft^3/s F=10 ft^3 x=.2 Co=.8) I get this, which seems much more reasonable.

untitled-1.jpg
 
Anyone want to qualify my answer here? Should I re-post this somewhere else? Hello?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top