Reconciling Magnetism in material and the Lorentz Force equation

AI Thread Summary
The Lorentz force equation, F = q (E + v x B), describes the force on charged particles due to electric and magnetic fields, but its connection to magnetism in materials is complex. In ferromagnetic materials like steel, aligned electron spins create a net magnetic moment, which interacts with external magnetic fields, leading to observable forces. Historically, early scientists like Faraday theorized about magnetism without knowledge of electrons, attributing magnetic effects to current loops in molecules. The understanding of these phenomena evolved with the advent of quantum mechanics, which introduced concepts like electron spin that classical theories could not fully explain. The relationship between magnetism and the Lorentz force remains a nuanced topic that bridges classical and quantum physics.
xerxes73
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

The Lorentz force equation, F = q (E + v x B), is a complete description of the force on bodies arising from Magnetism and Electricity, right? So somehow it must be possible to get from the magnetism that exists in materials (like in a magnet) to this equation. I don't see how the connection can be made. How could one get from having a magnet that always gives off a magnetic field that will cause a force on a piece of steel to this equation which has the velocity of charges? Is there a velocity of an electron in the magnet that will make this all work out. I am guessing that because of the bizarre nature of electrons the answer would be no, so how can one explain the nature of magnets with this equation.

And another question is how in how in heck did they make sense of this connection from magnets to this equation back in Maxwell's time when they didn't even know that an electron existed...?

Anyway, insight into this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -xerxes73
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xerxes73 said:
The Lorentz force equation, F = q (E + v x B), is a complete description of the force on bodies arising from Magnetism and Electricity, right? … How could one get from having a magnet that always gives off a magnetic field that will cause a force on a piece of steel to this equation which has the velocity of charges? Is there a velocity of an electron in the magnet that will make this all work out.

Hello xerxes73! :smile:

It's because the electrons in the steel are moving (spinning) charges, and so the magnetic field will pull them "sideways".

In most materials, these forces are random, because the electron spins are random, and so the net force is zero, and the material goes nowhere.

But in a magnetisable material such as steel, the electrons can all be persuaded to face the same way, so the forces add up. :wink:
And another question is how in how in heck did they make sense of this connection from magnets to this equation back in Maxwell's time when they didn't even know that an electron existed...?

I think they only dealt with magnetic fields from currents in wires. :smile:
 
Thanks Tiny-Tim So if you took the spins calculated what forces are in play and what E and B fields are there, they would follow this classical Lorentz force law, or does this break down pretty quick in the face of quantum mechanics?

I guess I have heard that Maxwell came up with a strange model with vortexes and things like that to explain the inner-workings of these forces in space and in atoms and perhaps that was in response to this need to explain magnetism in materials. Because even though he did a complete classical description of electricity and magnetism, electron spins would be something that he didn't have access to and so that must have been a big area of mystery to him and the other guys working this problem. Anyway, anyone with insights into that I would greatly appreciate hearing from.

Thanks! -xerxes73
 
Ferromagnetism is due to the aligned magnet moments and spins of the electrons in iron.
These are quantum effects, and spin angular momentum of a point particle is not a classical concept. The force grad(m.B) and torque mXB on an electron magnetic moment cannot be derived directly from the Lorentz force law, because there is no current involved. It is a new type of force, but can be inferred by analogy with the interaction of a current loop. In another thread, it was noticed that the energy of a QM magnetic moment in a magnetic field had a sign (-m.B) opposite that of a current loop in a magnetic field (+m.B).

Early on, Farady conjectured that ferromagnetism was due to current loops in molecules, and (although that was before my time) I think that was the general feeling until QM spin entered.
 
xerxes73 said:
Hello,

The Lorentz force equation, F = q (E + v x B), is a complete description of the force on bodies arising from Magnetism and Electricity, right? So somehow it must be possible to get from the magnetism that exists in materials (like in a magnet) to this equation. I don't see how the connection can be made. How could one get from having a magnet that always gives off a magnetic field that will cause a force on a piece of steel to this equation which has the velocity of charges?
And another question is how in how in heck did they make sense of this connection from magnets to this equation back in Maxwell's time when they didn't even know that an electron existed...?

Hello Xerces73-
Who needs equations like Maxwell's equations or the Lorentz Law of Force, which were developed in the 1860's and 1870's. Look here http://www.sparkmuseum.com/MOTORS.HTM to see the electric motor Faraday built in 1821, ten years before J. C. Maxwell was even born.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top