Rectangle inscribed in generic ellipse

v0id19
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Largest possible area of a rectangle inscribed in the ellipse (x2/a2)+(y2/b2)=1

Homework Equations


Area of the rectangle = length*height


The Attempt at a Solution


I have it set up so that the four corners of the rectangle are at (x,y) (-x,y) (-x,-y) (x,-y) and that area therefore is A=(2x)(2y).
In order to find the max area, I know I need to differentiate the equation, so I need to eliminate either x or y.
Using the ellipse equation, I found x to be equal to sqrt(a2-(y2a2)/b2).
Substituting that into the area equation I get:
A=2(sqrt(a2-(y2a2)/b2))*(2y).

And differentiating that has been a nightmare and I haven't gotten it right yet. I know a and b are constants, and become one in the derivative.

But is there any easier way of solving this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like "Laplace multipliers" would make this much simpler. You have an ellipse of the form b2x2+ a2y2= a2b2. I notice you are assuming that the maximal area rectangle has its sides parallel to the axes of the ellipse. I'm not sure that follows easily but I can't see any more general way of doing this. You want to maximize A(xy)= xy with the constraint F(x,y)= b2x2+ a2y2= a2.
\nabla A= y\vec{i}+ x\vec{j} and \nabla F= 2b^2x\vec{i}+ 2a^2y\vec{j}.

One must be a multiple of the other.
 
I'm just in calculus BC and am not familiar with 'laplace multipliers' how does that work?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top