Rectilinear and Rotational Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the landing gear of an aircraft as a wheel with an attached damper and spring, aiming to derive the equation of motion. The equation presented is (I+mr^2)a + cr^2v + kr^2x = 0, where variables represent acceleration, velocity, displacement, spring stiffness, and damping coefficient. The contributor is struggling with the derivation, particularly with an extra term involving mr^3xtheta(double dot). Clarifications are sought regarding the mass of the wheel and the assumption that the wheel rolls without slipping. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for all masses involved in the system.
phiska
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Landing Gear of an aircraft can be modeled as a wheel with damper and spring attached horizontally.

I have to show that the equation of motion is given by
(I+mr^2)a + cr^2v + kr^2x = 0

where a= acceleration, v= velocity, x= displacement and spring stiffness = k and damping coefficient = c.

I realize i have use resultant forces = ma, and then substitute for friction into the sum of moments about the centre= 0.5(mr^2).

However, when i do this, i get an extra mr^3xtheta(double dot).

Am i missing the point with respect to intial conditions or is my maths just all over the place?

Help!

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phiska said:
Landing Gear of an aircraft can be modeled as a wheel with damper and spring attached horizontally.

I have to show that the equation of motion is given by
(I+mr^2)a + cr^2v + kr^2x = 0

where a= acceleration, v= velocity, x= displacement and spring stiffness = k and damping coefficient = c.
It looks to me like you are trying to describe the equation of motion of the centre of mass of the wheel. Is r the radius of the wheel? What is the mass, m? It looks like the mass of the wheel only. What about the mass of the rest of the gear (eg. spring)?

AM
 
mass of wheel, m, radius of wheel, r, mass of spring and damper not considered and no mass of rest of landing gear.

Also, wheel should roll without slipping.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top