Recursive definition construction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around constructing a recursive definition for the number of ways to stack n red, white, green, and blue poker chips, ensuring that no two consecutive blue chips are present. Participants are exploring the implications of this constraint and attempting to derive a recursive relationship based on their observations and calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive a recursive formula by analyzing combinations of stacks that end in blue versus those that do not. Some are questioning the inductive nature of their approaches and whether they can establish a clear recursive relationship based on their findings.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different methods to express the recursive relationships for the stacking problem. Some participants have proposed splitting the problem into cases based on the last chip color, while others express uncertainty about how to formulate the recursion without a clear base case or pattern. The discussion remains active with various interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraint of ensuring no two blue chips are consecutive, which complicates the recursive formulation. There is a noted difficulty in correlating the exclusions caused by consecutive blue chips with the proposed recursive definitions.

dystplan
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Construct a recursive definition for the following:

The number of ways to stack n red, white, green, and blue poker chips so that there are no two consecutive blue poker chips.

The attempt at a solution
The number of possible combinations is 4^n minus the number of combinations that involve at least two blue poker next to each other.
The number of combinations with blue poker chips next to each other for the first 6 steps is:
3 chips: BBB + BB* (x3 other chips) + *BB (x3 other chips) = 7
4 chips: BBBB + BBB* (x2 x3) + BB** (x3 x3 x3) = 34
5 chips: BBBBB + BBBB* (x2 x3) + BBB** (x3 x3 x3) + BB*** (x4 x3 x3 x3) + BB*BB (x3) = 145
6 chips: BBBBBB + BBBBB* (x2x3) + BBBB** (x3x3x3) + BBB*** (x4x3x3x3) + BB**** (x5x3x3x3x3) + BB**BB (x4x3x3) + BB*BBB (x2x3) = 1+6+27+108+405+36+6 = 589

X1 = 4
X2 = (4)(4) -1 = 15
X3 = 4^3 - 7 = 57
X4 = 4^4 - 34 = 222
X5 = 4^5 - 145 = 879
X6 = 4^6 - 589 = 3507

I'm fairly sure those are correct, but I can't see any recursive function

Thank-you in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not really very 'inductive'. Why don't you try to split the number of ways to stack into ways that end in blue and ways that don't end in blue and write an inductive step for each separately?
 
Dick said:
That's not really very 'inductive'. Why don't you try to split the number of ways to stack into ways that end in blue and ways that don't end in blue and write an inductive step for each separately?

You mean something like:
X1 = 4
X2 = 12 + 4 = 16;
x3 = 48 + 4*4 = 64
x4 = 192 + 4*4*4 = 256

X1 = 4
Xn = X(n-1)*4 + 4^(n-1)

The problem is that I don't see any correlation with the rate at which exclusions occur due to consecutive blue poker chips. 0, 1, 7, 34, 145 (unless I'm doing something wrong to get to that, but I don't think I am).
 
dystplan said:
You mean something like:
X1 = 4
X2 = 12 + 4 = 16;
x3 = 48 + 4*4 = 64
x4 = 192 + 4*4*4 = 256

X1 = 4
Xn = X(n-1)*4 + 4^(n-1)

The problem is that I don't see any correlation with the rate at which exclusions occur due to consecutive blue poker chips. 0, 1, 7, 34, 145 (unless I'm doing something wrong to get to that, but I don't think I am).

No, I mean let B(n) be the number of ways to legally stack n chips ending in blue. Let N(n) be the number of ways that don't end in blue. Can you write B(n+1) and N(n+1) in terms of B(n) and N(n)? That would be recursive.
 
I get
B(1) = 1
B(2) = 3
B(3) = 12
B(4) = 36
B(5) = 171
B(6) = 648

I still don't see any way that's recursive =[ This problem has been driving me nuts all day.

Where X represents any chip but B:
5 stack:
XXXXB x 81 possibilities
BXBXB x 9 possibilities
BXXXB x 27
XBXXB x 27
XXBXB x 27

6 stack:
XXXXXB x 243
XBXBXB x 27
BXXXXB x 81
XBXXXB x 81
XXBXXB x 81
XXXBXB x 81
BXBXXB x 27
BXXBXB x 27
 
dystplan said:
I get
B(1) = 1
B(2) = 3
B(3) = 12
B(4) = 36
B(5) = 171
B(6) = 648

I still don't see any way that's recursive =[ This problem has been driving me nuts all day.

Where X represents any chip but B:
5 stack:
XXXXB x 81 possibilities
BXBXB x 9 possibilities
BXXXB x 27
XBXXB x 27
XXBXB x 27

6 stack:
XXXXXB x 243
XBXBXB x 27
BXXXXB x 81
XBXXXB x 81
XXBXXB x 81
XXXBXB x 81
BXBXXB x 27
BXXBXB x 27

The problem isn't asking you to count them. Suppose you KNOW B(n) and N(n). Can you write B(n+1) and N(n+1) in terms of those. That's all.
 
The only way I know to discover B(n+1) is to have a starting place and identify a pattern to progression. I understand that the question isn't asking me to count them, but how can I calculate the recursion without a base set that indicates a recursive relationship?
 
Last edited:
dystplan said:
The only way I know to discover B(n+1) is to have a starting place and identify a pattern to progression. I understand that the question isn't asking me to count them, but how can I calculate the recursion without a base set that indicates a recursive relationship?

Start with a chip pile in B(n) so it ends in blue. How many ways can you add another chip? Are the resulting piles in B(n+1) or N(n+1)? Now repeat the exercise for a chip pile in N(n).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
6K