Recursive function in a physics equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of recursive functions in physics equations, with participants exploring examples and implications of such functions. One example presented is the equation v(t) = 3 * v(t), which leads to a contradiction when attempting to find a positive solution, suggesting that v(t) must equal zero. Participants express curiosity about how to specify terminating conditions for recursive equations, particularly in relation to physical contexts. The conversation also touches on the connection between recursion and fractals, noting that many fractals are generated through recursive algorithms. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities and challenges of applying recursion in physics.
noize11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hoping someone can point out an example of a recursive function in a physics equation. If this is not a valid step that would be great to hear about too. Also if anyone has even tried to introduce such an equation in the past or how it might be represented. [I'm not the best student of maths].

I have a form in mind that I can only express with recursion.


Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by recursion? Is it of the form:
<br /> x_{n+1} = f(x_n)<br />
or is it something like
<br /> y = f(y)<br />
where f(y) is some nasty integral or something which you can't solve?

In either case, yes, recursion occurs a lot in physics and is the basis for things like perturbation theory.

Matt
 
Something more along these lines:

v(t) = 3 * v(t)

Obviously this equation cannot be solved as there is no terminating condition specified. Trying to solve this when t=1 for instance gives:

v(1) = 3* (3* (3 * (3 * (3* ...))))

I have a structure that relies on this form of recursion, but how do I go about specifying the terminating value? For instance, suppose I simply wanted a value > 8 * PI. How is it that I would express this?
 
Hmm, either something fishy is going on or you need help from a mathematician (which sadly I'm not).

By my reconing the only 'physical' solution to your equation is zero. My argument would run as follows:

Assume v(t) has a solution v(t)&gt;0.

v(t) = 3 v(t) \Rightarrow 1 = 3
This is a contradiction hence v(t)=0.

Unless I am wrong in thinking your symbol * means multiply?

Ok, as I said before I am not a mathematician so if I've done something stupid please don't hurt me :)

Matt
 
Would you like to explain better what you are trying to do. It is interesting your topic and please give us details. I really don't know what to say about your recursive physics, but I ran into similar ideas, too. Maybe I can help :)
 
fractals

BreAkeR said:
Would you like to explain better what you are trying to do. It is interesting your topic and please give us details. I really don't know what to say about your recursive physics, but I ran into similar ideas, too. Maybe I can help :)

Aren't fractals recursive?
 
mee said:
Aren't fractals recursive?

If by that you mean a great many of them are generated by recursive algorithms, then yes they definitely are.

Matt
 
Back
Top