Red/blueshift due to orbiting planet

  • Thread starter Thread starter tumconn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
tumconn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The periodical oscillations of the spectral lines of a star incicate that there is a planet orbiting around it with a period of 2.1375 days.Calculate what the observed wavelengths of the NaI double line will be,which is normally observed at 586.6nm and 589.6nm.
Star's mass=1.2 solar masses
Assume the planet's mass is negligible compared to the mass of the star and that its orbit is circular.

Homework Equations


Kepler's law
Doppler effect

The Attempt at a Solution


I would guess the shift in wavelength is because the gravitational force acting on the star because of the planet's mass at the points radially away from the earth,cause the star to move with a miniscule speed u,resulting in a red/blueshift.
But,firstly, I can't calculate the mass of the planet in order to get the star's acceleration
and secondly,even if I did,the phrase "Assume the planet's mass is negligible" leads me to believe this is not the correct solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right. If the planet's mass is negligible, then there is no Doppler shift. Whoever wrote the problem is confused.
 
  • Like
Likes tumconn
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top