Reduced Circumference: Schwarzschild vs Kerr Metric

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moore1879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circumference
AI Thread Summary
The r-coordinate in the Schwarzschild metric represents the reduced circumference, but in the Kerr metric, it does not serve the same purpose. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the interpretation of the r-coordinate in the Kerr metric. A suggestion is made that a coordinate change could lead to a form where R(r) represents the reduced circumference for the azimuthal angle φ. This implies that while r in the Kerr metric is not the reduced circumference, it may have a different physical significance. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the implications of the Kerr solution in general relativity.
Moore1879
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Okay, I understand that the r-coordinate in the Schwarzschild metric represents the reduce circumference. My problem is that the r-coordinate in the Kerr metric is NOT the reduced circumference! What is it? Somebody, please answer this as quickly and as painlessly as possible!
Thank You
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Right, it is not. What is it? Sorry, I don’t know... I guess that if you make a coordinate change in a way that you get \inline{R(r)^2 d{\phi}^2} then \inline{R} will be the reduced circumference for \inline{\phi}}. May be this can give you a hint about a possible physical meaning of \inline{r}.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top