A Reducing Gaussian Noise in Antenna Impedance Measurements

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter uzi kiko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gaussian Noise
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring antenna impedance over time while dealing with Gaussian noise in the measurements. The user seeks an efficient method to extract the 'pure' impedance value from the noisy data, beyond simply averaging multiple samples. Suggestions include employing a Bayesian approach to leverage prior information and improving the measurement circuit to minimize noise. Additionally, there are inquiries about the measurement setup and environment, indicating that external factors may contribute to the noise. Overall, the conversation emphasizes finding effective noise reduction techniques in impedance measurements.
uzi kiko
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
Hi

I am measuring the impedance of an operating antenna over time.
Assuming the environment is not changing and the antenna temperature remain constant (No thermal drift) I am receiving the impedance value and additional noise that I want to model as Gaussian noise.
So my simple model is:
Y = X + Z. Where Y is the output, X is the 'pure' impedance value and Z is the noise.
My question is what is the best way to extract X.

Obviously I can sample many samples and find the average value, but I am looking for a less wasteful way.

Thanks a lot
Mosh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could use a Bayesian approach where you account for whatever prior information you have.
 
uzi kiko said:
Hi

I am measuring the impedance of an operating antenna over time.
Assuming the environment is not changing and the antenna temperature remain constant (No thermal drift) I am receiving the impedance value and additional noise that I want to model as Gaussian noise.
So my simple model is:
Y = X + Z. Where Y is the output, X is the 'pure' impedance value and Z is the noise.
My question is what is the best way to extract X.

Obviously I can sample many samples and find the average value, but I am looking for a less wasteful way.

Thanks a lot
Mosh
Can you post diagrams of your setup and the schematic of the circuit you are using to monitor its impedance? Are you doing this in an anechoic chamber or shielded room? I'm guessing most of the noise you are seeing is coming from your measurement circuit, and you may be able to reduce the noise of that circuit with some attention to details...
 
Thanks a lot.
Dale said:
You could use a Bayesian approach where you account for whatever prior information you have.

Thanks. This is exactly the answer I looked for.
 
berkeman said:
Can you post diagrams of your setup and the schematic of the circuit you are using to monitor its impedance? Are you doing this in an anechoic chamber or shielded room? I'm guessing most of the noise you are seeing is coming from your measurement circuit, and you may be able to reduce the noise of that circuit with some attention to details...
Thanks a lot on your answer.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
744
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top