Reduction of magnetic repulsion

AI Thread Summary
Using N50 ring magnets around a steel rod may reduce their magnetic repulsion compared to using a non-ferrous material like aluminum. The attraction between the magnets and the steel rod influences their resting position, causing them to be closer together. This phenomenon occurs because the steel enhances the magnetic field interaction. A visual representation of the setup could clarify the configuration and its effects. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing the assembly's performance.
Skeet_man
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hope I'm in the right spot, google searches lead me here.

I am working with a couple N50 ring magnets which are axially magnetized, as an alternative to a coil spring. They are going around a steel rod which acts as the guide, and is an integral part of the complete assembly.

My question is, since the magnets will have some attraction to the steel, will their force of repulsion against each other be less than if I replaced the steel rod with a non-ferrous material? What lead me to ask is that I notice that the resting position of both magnets is closer when they are on the steel rod than if I substitute a piece of aluminum as a guide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skeet_man said:
Hope I'm in the right spot, google searches lead me here.

I am working with a couple N50 ring magnets which are axially magnetized, as an alternative to a coil spring. They are going around a steel rod which acts as the guide, and is an integral part of the complete assembly.

My question is, since the magnets will have some attraction to the steel, will their force of repulsion against each other be less than if I replaced the steel rod with a non-ferrous material? What lead me to ask is that I notice that the resting position of both magnets is closer when they are on the steel rod than if I substitute a piece of aluminum as a guide.
Welcome to PF. Can you provide a drawing of this? I am having trouble picturing the configuration and it is not clear what you are trying to do with this.

AM
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top