Redundant degrees of freedom in EM fields?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the degrees of freedom in electromagnetic (EM) fields, specifically identifying six total degrees of freedom associated with the electric field (E) and magnetic field (B). By applying Maxwell's equations, these can be reduced to four degrees of freedom: three from the vector potential and one from the scalar potential, leaving two redundant degrees of freedom. These redundancies relate to the polarization of EM waves and gauge symmetry, with the Lorenz gauge condition further refining the system to two transverse polarization states, corresponding to helicity +1 and helicity -1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with scalar and vector potentials
  • Knowledge of gauge symmetry in electromagnetism
  • Concept of polarization in electromagnetic waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Lorenz gauge condition in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of gauge transformations
  • Investigate the physical significance of helicity in EM waves
  • Learn about the conservation of charge and current densities in electrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between electromagnetic fields, gauge symmetry, and wave polarization.

DOTDO
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
If we consider E and B individually, there are 6 total degrees of freedom.

But they are actually related to each other by Maxwell's equations.

So we can find potentials and reduce dof to 4; 3 in vector potential and 1 in scalar potential.
Thus, there remain 2 redundant dof.

This is the problem...

I think one of them gives the polarization of EM wave and the other gives the gauge symmetry.

For example, the vector potential has gauge symmetry, A' = A + del (f)

f is scalar and has one dof.

Am I understanding right ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are 6 physical degrees of freedom, ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}##. Indeed, the homogeneous Maxwell equations,
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}+\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}$$
lead us to introduce the scalar and vector potentials ##\Phi## and ##\vec{A}##. The relation to the physical field is
$$\vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{A}-\vec{\nabla} \Phi, \quad \vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}.$$
The gauge symmetry makes everything invariant under the gauge transformations,
$$\vec{A}'=\vec{A} - \vec{\nabla} \chi, \quad \Phi'=\Phi+\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \chi$$
with an arbitrary scalar field ##\chi##. Thus we can pose one constraint in addition to the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations. If we choose the Lorenz-gauge condition,
$$\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \Phi + \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0,$$
the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations become separated
$$\Box \Phi=\rho, \quad \Box \vec{A}=\frac{1}{c} \vec{j}, \quad \frac{1}{c^2} \partial_t^2 - \Delta.$$
The entire system of Maxwell equations are only consistent, if electric charge is conserved,
$$\partial_t \rho+\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j}=0.$$
It turns out that this fixing of the gauge with the Lorenz gauge makes the solutions to the wave equations unique if charge and current densities are present.

For the free Maxwell field that's not the case, but even with the Lorenz-gauge constraint you still have the freedom to change the gauge via a field obeying the source-free wave equation. Thus you have to use another constraint to fix the gauge completely. One convenient possibility is to demand
$$\Phi=0$$
in addition to the Lorenz condition. This means you have
$$\Phi=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0,$$
i.e., you have only two transverse field-degrees of freedom left. There are only 2 polarization degrees of freedom (e.g., helicity +1 and helicity -1 states, which is the same as left- and right-circular polarized waves).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
973
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K