Reevaluating the Bohr Model of the Atom and Its Radiation Emission

AI Thread Summary
The Bohr model of the atom faces criticism for suggesting that electrons in orbit around the nucleus would continuously emit radiation, leading to a gradual loss of energy and eventual collapse into the nucleus. This is based on the principle that accelerating charges, such as electrons in circular orbits, emit electromagnetic waves. The discussion questions the necessity of radiation emission for electrons in stable orbits. It highlights a fundamental flaw in the model, as it does not account for the stability of electron orbits without energy loss. The conversation emphasizes the need for a more accurate representation of atomic behavior beyond the Bohr model.
AStaunton
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
I think a problem with the bohr model of the atom was that if the electron was in orbit around the nucleus, it would keep emitting radiation of longer and longer wavelengths until it falls into nucleus.
Why does an electron in orbit necessarily have to emit radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electron in orbit is accelerating. And accelerating charges radiate EM waves.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top