Reference frame for analyzing ball rolling down incline

AI Thread Summary
Analyzing a ball rolling down an incline involves considering the effects of friction and the changing pivot point due to static friction. Each instant requires calculating torques and angular momentum, which depend on the chosen coordinate origin. However, this can complicate the analysis, leading to the suggestion that conservation of energy is a more effective approach. By focusing on kinetic energy as a function of velocity and its relationship to gravitational potential energy, the problem can be simplified. Ultimately, calculations at arbitrary instants can be generalized to describe the ball's motion consistently for the entire time interval.
dsdsuster
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a question about how to analyze the problem of a ball rolling down an incline plane. Assuming there is friction, at each instant the ball swivels about a pivot point on the incline that is stationary due to static friction. We then would analyze the torques about this point and find the rate of change of angular momentum.

However, at every instant, aren't we switching to a pivot point at a different location along the incline. Angular momentum is dependent on the choice of the coordinate origin and so is torque.
Am I understanding the way we are analyzing this problem correctly? or am I over complicating things?

So if we are analyzing the system each instant and at a different pivot point, and a different coordinate origin, how can we piece together all the information so the speak and describe how the ball is moving to a single stationary observer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Problems like this are best solved through conservation of energy rather than through forces and torques. Don't worry about the forces or the pivot points, just calculate the KE as a function of velocity down the plane, and that is equal to the change in gravitational PE.
 
dsdsuster said:
So if we are analyzing the system each instant and at a different pivot point, and a different coordinate origin, how can we piece together all the information so the speak and describe how the ball is moving to a single stationary observer?
The thing is that we do the calculation at an arbitrary instant of time, within the time interval we are interested in. Since the result of the calculation is shown to hold true for an arbitrary instant of time within the interval, we can conclude that the result holds for all instants of time in question.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top