Reference frames in relativity

Thread starter nemzy
Start date Mar 7, 2005
Tags

Frames Reference Reference frames Relativity

AI Thread Summary

In the context of relativity, when two events occur simultaneously at different points on the x-axis of reference frame S, an observer moving in the positive X direction perceives the event with the larger x coordinate first. This phenomenon arises due to the relativity of simultaneity, which states that simultaneity is not absolute but depends on the observer's frame of reference. The observer's motion affects their perception of the timing of events. After reviewing the material, the initial confusion about the order of events was clarified. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity.

Mar 7, 2005

nemzy

why is it that when two events occur simultaneosuly at separated points on the x-axis of reference fram S, the observer moving in the positive X direction sees the event withe largest x coordinate first

shouldnt it be the smallest?

Physics news on Phys.org

Mar 7, 2005

nemzy

nm i reread my book and found the answer thanks

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...

View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

View full post »

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

View full post »