Reflected wave at complex refrective index

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter superg33k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Index Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of reflected waves at complex refractive indices, specifically addressing the amplitude ratio of reflected to incident waves given by the formula \(\frac{E_{r0}}{E_{i0}} = \frac{n_1-n_2}{n_1+n_2}\). When \(n_2\) is complex, the reflected wave \(E_{r0}\) becomes complex, indicating that the physical wave consists of two out-of-phase components. This phenomenon leads to the reflected wave exhibiting partial circular polarization, particularly relevant in ellipsometry applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and complex numbers
  • Familiarity with refractive indices and their implications
  • Knowledge of polarization concepts in optics
  • Basic principles of ellipsometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical foundations of complex refractive indices
  • Explore the principles of wave interference and phase relationships
  • Learn about the applications of ellipsometry in material characterization
  • Investigate the effects of non-perpendicular incidence on wave behavior
USEFUL FOR

Optical physicists, materials scientists, and engineers involved in wave optics and polarization studies will benefit from this discussion.

superg33k
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
A plane wave can be described by the real part of the exponential wave equation:

[tex]\mathbf{E}=E_{0}e^{i(kz-wt)}[/tex]

Adding the subscript i or r for incident or reflected waves, the ratio of the amplitude of reflected to incident wave is given by:

[tex]\frac{E_{r0}}{E_{i0}} = \frac{n_1-n_2}{n_1+n_2}[/tex]

But if n2 is complex, then this leads to a complex Er0. What does this mean for the physical wave, the real part of E?

[tex]\mathbf{E}=E_{r0}e^{i(kz-wt)}=(Re\{E_{r0}\}+iIm\{E_{r0}\})e^{i(kz-wt)}=Re\{E_{r0}\}e^{i(kz-wt)}+Im\{E_{r0}\}e^{i(kz-wt+\pi/2)}[/tex]

To me it looks like 2 out of phase waves are reflected. If this is right can you point me somewhere I can read up more about it? Or have I abused some notation somewhere?

Thanks for your help understanding what's going on.
 
Science news on Phys.org
No, as you said, you have to take the real part of E, only. A complex E_0 can be written as [itex]|E_0|\exp(i\phi)[/itex]. Hence the reflected wave will be out of phase with the incident one.
For non-perpendicular incidence this leads to the reflected wave becoming partly circularly polarized and is used in elipsometry.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K