Reflection of Light: Understanding the Angle of Incidence & Reflection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the principle that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection (i=r) in ideal reflective surfaces, like plane mirrors. This phenomenon is explained by considering the collective interaction of photons with the atoms in a material, rather than individual atomic interactions. When light strikes a mirror, it behaves like a billiard ball hitting a bumper, with the electrons in the material scattering the photons. Although the i=r relationship is a useful simplification, more complex interactions occur at the atomic level, especially when examining narrower surfaces where diffraction effects become noticeable. Overall, while the basic principle holds true, a deeper understanding reveals a more intricate interplay of light and matter.
SciencePF
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
If reflection of light is an interaction with atoms how we get always angle i=angle r?
 
Science news on Phys.org
SciencePF said:
If reflection of light is an interaction with atoms how we get always angle i=angle r?

We don't always get that. For example, in a diffraction grating, the angle of incidence is not equal to the angle of reflection.
 
Ok, but suppose the case we always get reflection (plane mirror, polished surface metal ... ! What happens at atomic level when light varies it´s angle i and angle r is automatically adjusted to the same value as angle i?
 
SciencePF said:
If reflection of light is an interaction with atoms

It's not an interaction with individual atoms. You have to consider the atoms of a solid or liquid as a collective system which interacts with photons differently than simply as the sum of independent interactions with individual atoms.

To get an idea of what is involved, see post #4 of the Physics Forums FAQ, although it specifically addresses refraction rather than reflection.
 
Think of the photon as a billiard ball hitting a bumper. The electrons in the atoms in the mirror scatter an electron just like the bumper scatters the ball. It doesn't know to go at the right angle, it is merely worked upon by the mirror - which recoils.
 
Feynman's book "QED" decribes this nicely. Photons can scatter in a broad range of angles off every point on the mirror, but the paths add in phase. If you sum up the contributions to the electric field at a detector position, you find that the phases of most paths cancel, and the paths that don't cancel are those very near the point on the mirror where the incident angle equals the reflected angle. But the other parts matter too - as you make the mirror narrower and narrower (or as you look more and more carefully), you will start to see diffraction artifacts in the reflection. Theta(i) = Theta(r) is a ray-based simplification that captures enough detail for most purposes, but a correct treatment is much more complicated.

SciencePF said:
Ok, but suppose the case we always get reflection (plane mirror, polished surface metal ... ! What happens at atomic level when light varies it´s angle i and angle r is automatically adjusted to the same value as angle i?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top