Refraction and its connection quantum gravity

fet2105
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
For a while I have wondered if the refraction of light had any connection to gravity on small scales (dare I say . . . quantum gravity?!?). I found this paper in the Cornell University Library. Below is the link and a copy of the opening synopsis that anyone can see without downloading it. . . . Is the "effective refractive index" a mere coincidence of their words with my thoughts? Any thoughts anybody?

"Effective refractive index tensor for weak field gravity

Petarpa Boonserm, Celine Cattoen, Tristan Faber, Matt Visser, Silke Weinfurtner (Victoria University, New Zealand)
(Submitted on 8 Nov 2004 (v1), last revised 18 Mar 2005 (this version, v2))
Gravitational lensing in a weak but otherwise arbitrary gravitational field can be described in terms of a 3 x 3 tensor, the "effective refractive index". If the sources generating the gravitational field all have small internal fluxes, stresses, and pressures, then this tensor is automatically isotropic and the "effective refractive index" is simply a scalar that can be determined in terms of a classic result involving the Newtonian gravitational potential. In contrast if anisotropic stresses are ever important then the gravitational field acts similarly to an anisotropic crystal. We derive simple formulae for the refractive index tensor, and indicate some situations in which this will be important."

quote taken from:http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411034
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fet2105 said:
For a while I have wondered if the refraction of light had any connection to gravity on small scales ...

The short answer is no. :smile:

The usual refraction of light is not a function of gravitational forces. This is instead a electromagnetic field effect which is a function of the material the light is passing through (and the effective speed of light in that material).

There are gravitational effects that can do much the same thing, but these are seen only in the large scale (as per the article you reference). This is because gravity can slow light, but is relatively weak - and therefore requires the presence of a lot of mass to exert much effect.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top