Refraction of light-apparent speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter irunwithmonkeys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Refraction Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the apparent speed of an object moving in a liquid medium as observed from a medium with a different index of refraction. The indices of refraction are given as 1.2 for air and 1.47 for the liquid. The initial calculation using the formula v = c/n resulted in an apparent speed of 13.6 m/s, but clarification is needed regarding the application of the formula. The correct approach involves considering the relationship between real and apparent depths, leading to a different method for determining the apparent speed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately applying the principles of refraction to solve the problem.
irunwithmonkeys
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine two media: one is thick air and the other is a liquid medium of some kind. The index of refraction of the air medium is 1.2
and that of the liquid medium is 1.47.
You are standing in the air medium looking straight into the liquid medium. You observe an object inside the liquid medium moving directly towards you. The speed of the object is 20 m/s. Assume the glass wall is very thin and that it doesn't affect the results. What is the apparent speed of the object as seen by you?

Homework Equations



I used c = v/n so v = c/n

The Attempt at a Solution



v=c/n= 20 [m/s] divided by 1.47 = 13.6 [m/s]

Can someone please help verify this is correct. Or am I doing this all wrong? Thank you very much for helping. I really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v=c/n= 20 [m/s] divided by 1.47 = 13.6 [m/s] In this formula v is the velocity of the light in the medium, not the object. If T and T' are the real and apparent depths in the liquid then you can wright 1.47/T = 1.2/T'. After 1 second real depth becomes T - 20 m and apparent depth will be T' - X. Find X
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top