Refractive index of different colors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing an experiment to measure the refractive indices of different colors using a white laser, color filters, and a glass block. The original plan involves measuring angles of incidence and refraction, but participants note that the small variation in refractive index with frequency complicates this. Suggestions include exploring total internal reflection and using trigonometry to measure beam positions instead of relying solely on protractors for small angle differences. The consensus is that while a prism would simplify the experiment, the rectangular glass block is required, and accurate length measurements can aid in determining refractive differences. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of adapting measurement techniques to account for the limitations of the equipment.
MrEinstein
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to design an experiment to determine the difference in refractive indices for different colors.

Assume you have : color filters,glass block



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I want to do it buy shining a white laser light through filters into the glass block and measuring the angle of incidence and refraction using a protractor. But they say to take into account the fact that the variation of refractive index with frequency is very small. So what else can I do to take that into account?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Total reflection might be interesting to study, as it is quite sensitive to small angle differences.
A prism would be easier, of course.
 
But what exactly do we use to measure the angle of refraction? It's going to be such a small angle difference that a protractor can't help. Yeah,with a prism it would be easy but they say that you have a rectangular glass block so they clearly want you to use it.
 
Measure the position of the beam at different points and use trigonometry? If you just need the difference and not an absolute value, it is easier.
 
Ahhh trigs. Length can be measured more accurately than angles. This explains the glass block, instant right angled triangle.
Thank you man
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top