Regarding jk flip flop Q' stability.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the stability of the Q' output in JK flip flops, particularly when using RS flip flops with NOR gates. It highlights that under certain conditions (Q=1, J=1, K=0), Q' should not oscillate, as the AND gates will maintain the state. However, oscillation may occur when both J and K are high if the clock enable time exceeds the R/S delay. To prevent this issue, implementing a master-slave JK flip flop is recommended. The conversation also questions why textbooks often omit discussions about Q' in relation to JK, D, or T flip flops.
nascentmind
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to understand and analyze JK flip flop's (using RS flop flop i.e. using NOR gates). I have written out the characteristic table and when I give Q = 1, J=1 and K = 0 I am trying to analyze the Q' (Q complement) by giving the intial state to 0. I find that Q settles to 1 (i.e. Q(t+1)) but Q' oscillates between 0 and 1. How is this fixed? Is the Q' needed in JK flip flops? Also why do textbooks don't talk about Q' in JK or D or T but only Q and Q(t+1) ?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
J-K-Flip-Flop.jpg


No it won't oscillate for Q=1, J=1, K=0. AND gate with i/p K will always be 0 and AND gate with i/p Q' will always be 0, making FF to hold its state.

However, for J=1, K=1, If the clock enable time is larger than Q/Q' to R/S delay the circuit will oscillate. To resolve the problem use master slave JK FF.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top