Regarding signed dihedral angle doubt

sureshjrf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi to all..
I am doing Phd in bioinformatics, having little knowledge abt maths..
I have calculated Phi Psi angles(dihedral angle)between two planes...
But the thing is i didnt get proper sign for my result(may be + or -).
I used following formulae for calculate the dihedral angle between two planes...
cos(theta)=(A.B/|A||B|)

any one help me how can i get the signed values for my result..

my program value..
theta=cos inverse of (-0.717563607965311)
theta=135.9,

But i need the result as -135.9

tanks in advance...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

sureshjrf said:
I have calculated Phi Psi angles(dihedral angle)between two planes...
But the thing is i didnt get proper sign for my result(may be + or -).
I used following formulae for calculate the dihedral angle between two planes...
cos(theta)=(A.B/|A||B|)

my program value..
theta=cos inverse of (-0.717563607965311)
theta=135.9,

But i need the result as -135.9

Hi sureshjrf! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Cos doesn't care :rolleyes: about the sign …

cos(x) = cos(-x).

So cos(135.9) = cos(-135.9). :wink:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top