Related Rates, why doesn't my solution work?

Tclack
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Conical water tank, vertex down. Radius of 10ft, 24 ft high. Water flows into tank at 20 cubic ft/ min. How fast is the depth of the water increasing at 16ft?

r=10ft
y=16ft
dV/dt=20 cubic ft/min
dy/dt=?

So here was my attempt:

V=1/3 (pi r^2) y
I treated r as a constant so I could find dv/dt in terms of dy/dt

dV/dt= 1/3 pi r^2 dy/dt
dy/dt= (dV/dt)3/(pi r^2)

I found t by taking similar triangles
10/24=r/16 so r = 10*16/24 = 20/3

I plugged in the data and got 27/20pi

The answer is: 9/20pi

Here's the actual solution:
they changed r in terms of y
r=(2/3)y

V=(1/3) (pi r^2) y substituting r gives V=(1/3) pi(2/3)^2 (y^3)=(4pi/27) y^3
dV/dt= (4pi/27)(3y^2)dy/dt

dy/dt= dV/dt * 27/[4pi(3y^2)]
plugging in 16ft for y yields: 9/20pi, the right answer

What went wrong with my solution? Both solutions seem mutually correct. They're not, but I fail to recognize what's wrong with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution assumes r is a constant. It's not. As the level of the water decreases r changes as well as y.
 
That makes sense. I think given a similar problem, I would make the same mistake.

So, next time I get a similar problem, I'll do implicit differentiation, and get the term dr/dt, I would look at my givens and see that I have no info on dr/dt, then I would go back and get rid of r (by substituting it with y) so I don't have to deal with it...

I appreciate it, thanks.
 
Another question: I'm working on a problem involving piling sand in the shape of a cone. The cone's height and diameter are always equal. The information gave that it's height is increasing at a rate of 5 ft /min at the instant when it's 10ft, I'm supposed to find the rate at which the sand is pouring onto the pile.
V=1/3 pi r^3
so dV/dt= pi (r^2)dr/dt
When I worked through it, I was stumped as to what to put down for dr/dt

it's DIAMETER is increasing at 5 ft/min, If at that moment, it were to stay at 5 ft/min, a minute later the new diameter would be 15ft. the radius went from 5ft to 7.5 ft. So It appears that the radius is increasing at 2.5 ft/min.

When I plugged in that information, I got the wrong answer. The books answer matches if you assume dr/dt=5ft/min

What's wrong with me now?
 
Tclack said:
Another question: I'm working on a problem involving piling sand in the shape of a cone. The cone's height and diameter are always equal. The information gave that it's height is increasing at a rate of 5 ft /min at the instant when it's 10ft, I'm supposed to find the rate at which the sand is pouring onto the pile.
V=1/3 pi r^3
so dV/dt= pi (r^2)dr/dt
When I worked through it, I was stumped as to what to put down for dr/dt

it's DIAMETER is increasing at 5 ft/min, If at that moment, it were to stay at 5 ft/min, a minute later the new diameter would be 15ft. the radius went from 5ft to 7.5 ft. So It appears that the radius is increasing at 2.5 ft/min.

When I plugged in that information, I got the wrong answer. The books answer matches if you assume dr/dt=5ft/min

What's wrong with me now?

The volume is V=(1/3)*pi*r^2*h. If h is equal the diameter, then h=2r. That makes the volume (2/3)*pi*r^3. Not (1/3)*pi*r^3. I think what's wrong with you is that you may need some sleep. You just aren't thinking about this very clearly.
 
Yeah I think you're right, I worked the problem again given your new information and I got the wrong answer...because in whatever screwed up mathematical system I'm using, 5^3 =625.

And I have another mystery, but I have a feeling it's not the mystery I think it is. I should look at it tomorrow after I've lain in bed with my eyes shut for 8 hours.

Thanks for your insight. ZZZ
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top