Relating the entropy of an ideal gas with partial derivatives

Mayan Fung
Messages
131
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
For an ideal gas, use ##dE=TdS-PdV+\mu dN## to prove
1. ##V(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T})_{\mu} = S##
2. ##V(\frac{\partial P}{\partial \mu})_T = N##
Relevant Equations
##dE=TdS-PdV+\mu dN##
It looks very easy at first glance. However, the variable S is a variable in the given expression. I have no clue to relate the partial derivatives to entropy and the number of particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the extensible properties of the system as variables, we know that ##E (x \lambda) = \lambda E(X)## (Homogeneous function of degree a=1), so that we can say

##x * \nabla f = a f## (Euler's homogeneous theorem), where ##x = (x_{1},x_{2},...,x_{n})## is the vector with the variables.

So that
$$S( \partial E/ \partial S ) + V ( \partial E/ \partial V)+ N (\partial E/ \partial N )= a * E$$
$$ ST - PV + N \mu = E$$

The rest i think you can go on, eventually you will get the Gibbs Duhem equation
 
  • Like
Likes Mayan Fung and etotheipi
Just to add to what @LCSphysicist wrote, first try to re-write each term on the RHS according to ##x\mathrm{d}y = \mathrm{d}(xy) - y\mathrm{d}x##.
 
Thanks! This makes me recall the fact that ##G=\mu N## and ##G=U-TS+\mu N##
 
Mayan Fung said:
Thanks! This makes me recall the fact that ##G=\mu N## and ##G=U-TS+\mu N##
Careful, it's ##G := U -TS + pV = \mu N##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top