Relation between affine connection and covariant derivative

nilsgeiger
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I now study general relativity and have a few questions regarding the mathematical formulation:

1) What ist the relation between an connection and a covariant derivative?
Can you explain the exact difference?

2) One a lorentzian manifold, what ist the relation between the levi-civita-connection and the used covariant derivative?

Unrelated, but probably not important enough to justify a new thread:

3) In the einstein field equitations the ricci curvature tensor is used, the non trivial contraction of the riemann curvature tensor.
My professor told me, you can understand this as averaging along all curves of the parellel transports.
Is there an easy way to see this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nilsgeiger said:
1) What ist the relation between an connection and a covariant derivative?
Can you explain the exact difference?
The affine connection is the operator ##\nabla## that takes a vector and a vector field as input and gives a vector as result. A covariant derivative is the result ##\nabla_XY## of applying that operator to a vector field ##Y## and a vector ##X##.

At least, that's the definition used in my text: John Lee's 'Riemannian Manifolds: an Introduction to Curvature'. I daresay the exact definitions vary between writers.
 
nilsgeiger said:
2) One a lorentzian manifold, what ist the relation between the levi-civita-connection and the used covariant derivative?
If one follows the framework of my previous post, the Levi-Civita connection on a Pseudo-Riemannian manifold is the affine connection that is both symmetric and compatible with the metric. 'Compatible' has a number of different definitions, the simplest of which is that the metric must have zero covariant derivative under that connection, in every direction, everywhere in the manifold (often written as ##\nabla g\equiv 0##).

It is provable that the Levi-Civita connection is unique, ie there is only one affine connection on a Pseudo Riemannian manifold that has those two properties.

The covariant derivative of a vector field on a Pseudo-R manifold with respect to a vector in its tangent bundle will be the result of applying the Levi-Civita connection to that vector field and vector.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top