Relation between Angular speeds/accelerations

  • Thread starter Thread starter mircobot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Relation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a homework problem involving two wheels connected by a belt, focusing on their angular speeds and accelerations. Wheel A, with a radius of 15 cm, accelerates at 1.6 rad/s² from rest, while wheel C has a radius of 22 cm. The goal is to determine the time for wheel C to reach an angular speed of 140 rev/min, using the relationship between angular and linear velocities. Key equations discussed include the angular velocity equation for constant acceleration and the conversion of linear velocity to angular velocity. The participant ultimately finds the time to be approximately 0.4375 seconds after clarifying the relationships and correcting their approach.
mircobot
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I have been having trouble with the following question on my homework:

wheel A of radius rA = 15 cm is coupled by belt B to wheel C of radius rC = 22 cm. The angular speed of wheel A is increased from rest at a constant rate of 1.6 rad/s2. Find the time needed for wheel C to reach an angular speed of 140 rev/min, assuming the belt does not slip.

HINT: The constant angular-acceleration equations apply. The linear speeds at the rims are equal. What then is the relation between the angular speeds and the angular accelerations?

please help, thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For reference:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/rotq.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html

Now there are two concepts here.

1. A disc starts from rest at constant angular acceleration.

So find the equation that gives the angular velocity at the surface of A, at constant angular acceleration at time = t.

2. Then determine the tangential velocity of the belt B, v(t).

The belt drives disc C, so one has to convert v(t) to the angular velocity of C and when it reaches 140 rpm (pay attention to units; angular velocity is in rad/s). It's somewhat the reverse process of part 1.
 
the only equation i can think of that relates to a constant acceleration is v1 = v2 +at

i need some more help because i know that isn't right...

i found the time to be .4375s
 
One needs the analog of v1 = v2 +at for rotational motion.

\omega(t) = \omega_0 + \alpha*t, where \omega(t) is angular velocity, and \alpha is angular acceleration.

The linear or tangential velocity at radius r is just v(t) = \omega(t)*r,

and dividing by r, \omega(t) = (v(t)/r.
 
alright, that helped a lot. now i see the relationship and substitution... also i was using A's radius, not C's.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top