Relation between Bernoulli's theorem and aeroplanes

AI Thread Summary
Aeroplanes utilize Bernoulli's theorem, which explains the relationship between airspeed and pressure, to understand lift generation. As air flows over a wing, it moves faster over the top than the bottom, creating a pressure differential that results in lift. The discussion highlights a debate on whether lift is solely due to Bernoulli's theorem or the wing's downwash effect, emphasizing that both factors contribute to lift. An ideal wing diverts airflow downwards while maintaining energy balance, but this can lead to violations of Bernoulli's equation in practical scenarios. Demonstrations, such as those in wind tunnels, visually illustrate these pressure differences and the effects of varying angles of attack.
abhijithmatt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i heard that aeroplanes are an application of benoulis theorem. Can you please explain it to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a way, they are. Provided you take on faith the fact that the air flowing over a wing moves faster over the top than over the bottom, then Bernoulli's theorem, which describes the inverse relationship between pressure and velocity, will allow you to calculate the pressure on the top and the bottom of the wing, and therefore the lift.

Understanding why the air moves faster over the wing is more difficult.
 
If you read enough forums you will eventually come across an argument between two groups of people. One camp will be arguing that the lift produced by a wing is due to the application of Benoulis theorem, the other camp will be arguing that lift is produced by the wing accelerating the airflow downwards. It's a false dichotomy.
 
A wing produces lift by diverting air downwards. This process involves creation of pressure differentials that coexist with acceleration of air, and the acceleration of air from higher pressure areas to lower pressure areas created by a wing approximately follows Bernoulii's theorem. Bernoulli's basic equation assumes that total energy of the air is not changed, but a wing affects the total energy somewhat, so Bernoulli's equation is an approximation.

The point made by CWatters is that Bernoulli's theorem and downwash theorem both apply to aeroplanes, and that they aren't in conflict.

Using an ideal wing as a frame of reference, it diverts the relative flow downwards without changing the speed, so the total energy remains constant and Bernoulli isn't violated, but from the air's frame of reference, the once still air ends up being accelerated downwards (lift) and somewhat forwards (drag), resulting in a non-zero "exit velocity" (the speed of the affected air when it's pressure first returns to ambient), and in the air's frame of reference work is performed on the air, violating Bernoulli's equation. An efficient wing diverts a large amount of air by a small angle, and from the air's frame of reference, the total energy added to the air is relatively small.
 
Last edited:
Nice explanation.

Just for info.. I recall seeing a demonstration in the London Science Museum some years ago that comprised a section of wing in a simple wind tunnel. It had a set of water filled tubes connected to holes in the top and bottom wing surface that showed the pressure difference between top and bottom surfaces at various points on the chord. You could rotate the wing to change the angle of attack and see how the pressure distribution changed. Nice simple demo of the Bernoulli part of the story but you couldn't see what the airflow behind the wing was doing as there was no smoke system or similar.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top