Relation between cavity resonance and sound speed

AI Thread Summary
Inhaling helium raises the sound speed, resulting in a higher pitch, akin to a "Donald Duck" voice, due to changes in cavity resonance. The wavelength of sound is determined by the size of the vocal cavity, while frequency is influenced by both the speed of sound in the gas and the properties of the vocal folds. Some argue that frequency is solely dependent on the vocal folds, suggesting that the gas only affects timbre. The discussion highlights the complexity of how sound frequency and cavity resonance interact, particularly when gas composition changes. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping the physics of sound production.
haleycomet2
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Our sound will be like "Donald Duck" if we inhale helium gas and the explanation from web is because" The cavity resonances which determine the vocal formats would be raised by the higher sound speed,"(http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/souspe.html). Why cavity resonance raise as sound speed raise?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi haleycomet2! :smile:

wavelength depends only on cavity size

frequency depends on … ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi haleycomet2! :smile:

wavelength depends only on cavity size

frequency depends on … ? :wink:

If wavelength depend only on cavity size,then the frequency of sound is higher as the speed of gas becomes higher(cavity size stay constant when we make comparison of two gases ).

However, some says that the frequency is only depend on vocal folds and it is independent of the gas.And the only change is the timbre.

Both explanation looked convincing but i don't know which is true.:confused:

Besides,why the cavity resonance is raised when sound speed get higher(cavity size remains same)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top