Relation between commutation and quantization

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between commutation relations and the quantization of physical systems, exploring whether these concepts are fundamentally linked. The scope includes theoretical aspects of quantum mechanics and mathematical reasoning related to operator representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the position-momentum commutation relations are fundamentally related to the quantization of a system, particularly in the context of bounded potentials.
  • Another participant points out that the commutation relation between position and momentum holds even for non-quantized states, such as a free particle wave packet.
  • A further inquiry is made about the validity of the notion that commutation and quantization are fundamentally related, seeking a more general mathematical demonstration of this relationship.
  • Another participant explains that quantization involves replacing classical phase space functions with quantum mechanical operators, illustrating this with the momentum operator in position space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between commutation and quantization, with some asserting a fundamental link while others highlight instances where commutation relations hold without quantization. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of this relationship.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes conditional statements regarding the necessity of bounded potentials for quantized eigenvalues and the implications of commutation relations in various contexts.

osturk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
relation between "commutation" and "quantization"

Hi people;

Over the several texts I have read, I got the impression that position-momentum commutation relations is the cause of "quantization" of the system. Or, they are somehow fundamentally related.

The only relation I know of, is to derive the momentum operator in position space, -i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}, from the commutation relation [x,p]=i\hbar, and then find the position and momentum eigenfunctions which turn out to be oscillating functions of x and p. Then, eigenvalue spectrum of these operators are then naturally "quantized", BUT only if the potential is bounding, like box, harmonic oscillator etc..

Now this demonstration of relation between commutation and quantization looks quite "indirect" to me, and also it is conditional (a bounding potential required to get quantized eigenvalues).

So my question is; is there a more fundamental demonstration of the relation between commutation relations and quantization of a system.

Thanks in advance for the answers.

Deniz
 
Physics news on Phys.org


But, the commutation relation still holds between x and p when x and p are not quantized, for a free particle wave packet.
 


Khashishi said:
But, the commutation relation still holds between x and p when x and p are not quantized, for a free particle wave packet.

Exactly.. I want to know if the notion that I've got, that commutation and quantization is fundamentally related to each other, is true or not.

If it is true; then, is there a mathematical way to show that in a more general way than the example that I gave above.
 


Quantization means replacing classical functions on phase space, here x and p by, QM operators; in position space p becomes an operator -id/dx.

The commutation relation for the operators x and p can derived from this position space representation, i.e.

[x, -id/dx] f(x) = (id/dx x) f(x) = i f(x) for all f(x), so [x, -id/dx] = i
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
947
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K