Relation for Inner Product with States from a Complete Set

tommy01
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I've found the following relation (in a book about the qm 3-body scattering theory):

<\Omega^{\pm}^{\dagger} \Psi_n|p>= ... = 0

where |p> is a momentum eigenstate.
So it is shown, that the inner Product is zero. Then they conclude that \Omega^{\pm}^{\dagger}|\Psi_n> = 0 because the p-states form a complete set.

How can this formally be shown?

thanky you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, something a little more general.

How is a ket \left| \psi \right> expressed with respect to the complete set of states \left| p \right>?
 
This isn't mentioned in the book. But i assume |\Psi>=\int |\mathbf{p}><\mathbf{p}|\Psi> d\mathbf{p} as usual. Or what you mean?
thanks for the quick reply.
 
tommy01 said:
This isn't mentioned in the book. But i assume |\Psi>=\int |\mathbf{p}><\mathbf{p}|\Psi> d\mathbf{p} as usual. Or what you mean?
thanks for the quick reply.

Yes.

Now, what is the only possibility for |\Psi> if <\mathbf{p}|\Psi> is zero for every \mathbf{p}?
 
thanks a lot.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top