Relation of max velocity and max tension

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an equation for maximum velocity (vmax) in relation to maximum tension (Tbreak), mass (m), string length (L), and gravitational acceleration (g) for a ball in circular motion. Participants emphasize the importance of attempting problems independently to enhance learning and understanding. There is a consensus that sharing one's thought process and challenges can lead to more effective assistance. Mistakes made during problem-solving are viewed as valuable learning opportunities. Overall, the conversation encourages active engagement and self-exploration in scientific problem-solving.
hav0c
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
a ball is whirling on the end of the string L
the max tension is Tbreak
the max velocity is vmax
find an equation for vmaxin m(mass of ball)Tbreak, L and g
 

Attachments

  • conpend.gif
    conpend.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 292
Physics news on Phys.org
bigerst said:
um does this go under homework type questions?
im not sure i thought of the question myself, as i was doing circular motion
but thanks for the derivation.
 
@havoc: you will get the most out of these forums if you attempt the problem yourself - then we will know what you are getting stuck on. Otherwise we just end up doing the problem for you and you don't learn as much.

What didn't you understand about the problem?

@bigerst: If you suspect homework - why give so much detail?
Even if it isn't homework, the questioner will still be helped best if you just point them in the right direction where they are lost and let them make the journey ;)
 
Simon Bridge said:
@havoc: you will get the most out of these forums if you attempt the problem yourself - then we will know what you are getting stuck on. Otherwise we just end up doing the problem for you and you don't learn as much.

What didn't you understand about the problem?

i was getting mixed up while using L and T during trig so i was getting all sorts of weird solutions.
I'll take care from now and will explain my situation completely(i did try it myself)
havoc
 
No worries - it is good that you try things out yourself ... it is better that you tell people what you've tried. That is information we can use to help you and fyi you won't be showing anyone anything they haven't done themselves.

In general, in science, where you make mistakes is often more valuable than where you get things right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top