Relationship between Cadella and Wattage?

AI Thread Summary
There is a relationship between candela output and wattage for LED lights, often specified by manufacturers as candelas per watt. Higher candelas per watt indicate greater efficiency of the lamp. While candelas measure total light output, lumens per watt is a more practical metric for brightness in applications, as it considers how light interacts with surfaces. The candela is advantageous for highly directional light sources like LEDs, making it easier to assess their performance without angle dependency. Understanding both metrics is essential for evaluating lighting efficiency and effectiveness.
Starwatcher16
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Is there a general relationship that can be used for LED lights tying togethor Cadella output and Wattage required?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, you see it in the maker's specifications for the lamp.

They sometimes give a figure of X candelas per watt.

The more candelas per watt, the more efficient the lamp is.

A candela is roughly equal to the old candle power unit.
 
More commonly, LEDs and other lighting products, are rated in units of luminous efficiency in terms of lumens per watt, a more useful metric for most lighting applications because while candelas tell you the total amount of light output, lumens tell you how much light what you're illuminating will get--how bright it will appear. You can derive that from candelas, too, of course but you have to use a little math and know the radiating angle of your light source.
 
I've seen both, but lumens per watt is more common, for sure.
The candela is probably a better unit because it doesn't depend on the angle of light exit from the device.
With highly directional devices like LEDs it is getting harder to compare them in terms of lumens.

There is a good comparison chart on Wikipedia for Luminous Efficiency:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_efficiency

For comparison, here is a bit about the relationship between Lumens and candelas:

a light source that uniformly radiates one candela in all directions radiates a total of 4π lumens. If the source were partially covered by an ideal absorbing hemisphere, that system would radiate half as much luminous flux—only 2π lumens. The luminous intensity would still be one candela in those directions that are not obscured.
 
Well, thanks for the info.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top