Relationship between commutators and observables

AI Thread Summary
For two observables A and B represented by linear quantum operators A^ and B^ to have definite values simultaneously, their commutator [A^, B^] must equal zero. This condition indicates that both operators can share a common eigenstate, allowing the system to possess well-defined values for both observables. The discussion clarifies that being in an eigenstate of an observable is essential for having a definite value, contradicting earlier assumptions about normalization constants. The misunderstanding about "definite value" was addressed, emphasizing that a normalized wavefunction must be an eigenfunction of the operator. Understanding these relationships is crucial in quantum mechanics for analyzing observables and their properties.
playoff
Messages
80
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose A^ and B^ are linear quantum operators representing two observables A and B of a physical system. What must be true of the commutator [A^,B^] so that the system can have definite values of A and B simultaneously?

Homework Equations


I will use the bra-ket notation for the inner product (sorry for lack of latex)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I assumed that for observables A and B to have a definite value, <psi*|A^|psi> and <psi*|B^|psi> have to be normalizable. Call a and b normalization constants of <psi*|A^|psi> and <psi*|B^|psi> respectively, then: a<psi*|A^|psi> = b<psi*|B^|psi> = 1.

Here I made my sloppy assumption that the equation above implies that A^ and B^ are proportional (A^=(b/a)*A^), which leads to that the commutator must be zero.

I made this assumption as both A^ and B^ are being "operated" by the same inner product, so the bolded equation can be reduced to aA^=bB^. Is this an assumption I can make?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation that you wrote down doesn't lead to any relation between ##\hat{A}## and ##\hat{B}##, since, as long as the expectation values are nonzero, we can always find ##a## and ##b## as the reciprocal of the corresponding expectation values. The values of ##a## and ##b## are unrelated.

The key here is to understand what "definite value" means in this context. For a system to have a definite value of an observable, it must be in an eigenstate of the observable. The problem wants you to figure out what this means when you have two observables
 
  • Like
Likes playoff
@fzero: Yes, I had a totally wrong understanding of a definite value. It makes sense that an operator has a definite value if the normalized wavefunction is its eigenfunction, thus the inner product becomes the eigenvalue.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top