Relationship between Electroplating and Kinetic Theory

AI Thread Summary
Electroplating is closely related to kinetic theory through the concept of particle collisions, where ions in the electrolyte must collide with the electrode for reduction to occur. The concentration of the electrolyte influences the likelihood of these collisions, impacting the efficiency of the electroplating process. Kinetic theory applies to both solids and liquids, as ions behave like small, colliding particles in a solution. Additionally, collision theory is relevant, emphasizing the importance of ion concentration and temperature on reaction rates. Understanding these relationships helps clarify the connection between electroplating and kinetic theory in chemistry.
paperdoll
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have this assignment from my chemistry teacher and it asks to relate electroplating with the kinetic theory? I don't really understand how the kinetic theory has anything to do with redox, or other chemistry applications.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I thought about how concentration of the electrolyte could affect electroplating, but those this have anything to do with the kinetic theory? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Borek said:
Whatever is going to be reduced must hit the electrode to do so.

Diffusion and fractal electrodeposition simulator (scroll down the page).

I use a mac computer, so the application cannot run :redface:

in the case of electroplating, does this mean the kinetic theory regarding solids/liquids or gases? because the cations and anions are ions so I'm not sure :confused:
 
Kinetic theory in the most general case treats everything as small, colliding balls. Ions in the solution behave exactly the same way. In liquids these "balls" interact even when not colliding, so liquids have a (more or less) constant volume, as opposed to gases.
 
Borek said:
Kinetic theory in the most general case treats everything as small, colliding balls. Ions in the solution behave exactly the same way. In liquids these "balls" interact even when not colliding, so liquids have a (more or less) constant volume, as opposed to gases.

"Whatever is going to be reduced must hit the electrode to do so"- okay so for kinetic theory and electroplating I should be writing about how particles within the electrolyte must collide with the electrode for redox to occur...

I could also talk about the collision theory as well right? how there needs to be enough concentration of ions and temperature? :shy:
 
Collision theory is about the reaction speed - yes, it plays a role here as well. But it plays a role in every chemical process, so it is hardly surprising.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top