Electroplating Experiment: Calculating Copper Mass from Silver Deposition

  • Thread starter Thread starter dav1d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electroplating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an electroplating experiment where participants are tasked with calculating the mass of copper deposited based on the deposition of silver. The conversation includes elements of electrochemistry, specifically focusing on Faraday's law of electrolysis and the reactions occurring during electrodeposition.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem involving the deposition of 21.6 g of silver and asks how to calculate the mass of copper deposited.
  • Another participant introduces Faraday's law of electrolysis and provides the formula for calculating mass based on electric charge, molar mass, and valency.
  • There is uncertainty about how to determine the total electric charge (Q) since only the amount of electricity passed is mentioned.
  • Participants discuss the valency of copper, noting that it can be either 1 or 2, leading to confusion about which value to use.
  • One participant suggests rearranging the equation to find Q using the known mass of silver deposited, but there is a misunderstanding regarding the reference to aluminum instead of silver.
  • Clarification is provided that the valency of copper in CuSO4 is 2+, which is confirmed by another participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to use the known mass of silver to find the charge and confirm that the valency of copper in CuSO4 is 2+. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the calculation steps and the correct interpretation of the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in understanding the relationships between the variables in the electrolysis equation, particularly in determining the total charge and the valency of copper. There are unresolved questions about the approach to solving the problem.

dav1d
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Exactly 21.6 g of silver is deposited during an
electroplating experiment. The same amount of
electricity is passed through 1.00 L of a 1.00 mol/L
CuSO4(aq) solution. What mass of copper is
deposited?
Relative atomic masses:
Ag 107.87; Cu 63.55

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no idea how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know Faraday's law of electrolysis?
 
No, never heard of it. Can you link me to it?
 
m=(Q/F)(M/z)

m is the mass of the substance liberated at an electrode in grams
Q is the total electric charge passed through the substance
F = 96,485 C mol−1 is the Faraday constant
M is the molar mass of the substance
z is the valency number of ions of the substance (electrons transferred per ion).


so

Q:how do i find the total charge? Only given The same amount of
electricity is passed

F=const
M: 63.55
z=1 or 2?
 
What reactions are taking place during electrodeposition of both metals? What is z?

Come on, show some effort, so far you are just asking for help on each step. We can help, we can't spoonfeed you.
 
I just don't really understand.

Redox is happening during the electrodeposition? Z is the valence number but copper is multivalent so it can be 1 or 2?

wait

Can't you just rearrange the equation for Q, plug in the 21.6 grams from aluminum and then find the Q?
Then redo the equation with Q solved for and then plugin everything else, F=const, M=unkown, and then Z still is 1 or 2?
 
No idea where did you got aluminum from. But yes, you have to find the charge from known amount of reduced silver.

You are specifically told to use CuSO4, what is the valence of the copper in this compound?
 
Exactly 21.6 g of silver is deposited during an
electroplating experiment. The same amount of
electricity is passed through 1.00 L of a 1.00 mol/L
CuSO4(aq) solution.

It should be 2+ for the Cu correct?
 
  • #10
dav1d said:
It should be 2+ for the Cu correct?

Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K