Relationship between inequalities in proofs

  • Thread starter Seacow1988
  • Start date
  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi,

Could you clarify the relationship between proofs that use ≤ and those that use <?

For example, if it's already proven that "abs(b) ≤ a if and only if -a≤ b≤a" can we say this implies that "abs(b) < a if and only if -a< b<a"? It seems that since the first statement holds for all abs(b) "less than or equal to" a, its application could narrowed to the case where abs(b) was simply "less than" a.

Thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
LCKurtz
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
9,535
751
Hi,

Could you clarify the relationship between proofs that use ≤ and those that use <?

For example, if it's already proven that "abs(b) ≤ a if and only if -a≤ b≤a" can we say this implies that "abs(b) < a if and only if -a< b<a"? It seems that since the first statement holds for all abs(b) "less than or equal to" a, its application could narrowed to the case where abs(b) was simply "less than" a.

Thanks!
It happens to be so for that example. But you can't just change them willy-nilly.

For example consider this statement:

If a function f which is continuous on 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 satisfies the inequality f(x) < 1 for all x with 0 < x < 1, then f(1) ≤ 1.

You can't change the conclusion to f(1) < 1 without making the statement false.
 
  • #3
182
0
Consider the fact that for any real number a in R, -|a| ≤ a ≤ |a| is true. It would be false it we replaced "≤" with "<". The symbol "≤" between two numbers x and y is logically equivalent to the statement "x < y OR x = y".
 

Related Threads on Relationship between inequalities in proofs

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
940
Top