Relationship of simple pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between angular frequency (ω) and periodic time (T) in the context of a simple pendulum. It is established that ω = 2π/T, which indicates that angular frequency is inversely proportional to the period. Additionally, T can be expressed as T = 2π√(l/g), linking the period to the pendulum's length and gravitational acceleration. The presence of 2π in both equations highlights a consistent relationship between these variables. Understanding these equations is essential for accurately defining the motion of a simple pendulum.
joelKID984
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hi guys,

I'm currently working on a physics report about a simple pendulum and can't figure out how to answer one of the questions:

3. "define all terms in the solution(x(t)=Acos(ωt)) and especially the relationship between angular frequency, and periodic time, T."

ive defined all the terms, A is amplitude, ω is angular frequency etc. but have no clue of the relationship between angular frequency, and periodic time?

I know that ω=2∏/T = 2∏f

and

T=2∏√l/g

but don't get their relationship?

any help will be great.

cheers,
Joel C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joelKID984 said:
I know that ω=2∏/T = 2∏f

This is your relationship here.

The other formula you gave just gives the periodic time as a function of length.
 
Thanks mate.

So I something like "it can be established that the relationship between angular frequency and period time is:

ω=2∏f"

Do I say anything else? There is 2∏ in both equations, is that some sort of relationship?

Cheers,
Joel
 
joelKID984 said:
Thanks mate.

So I something like "it can be established that the relationship between angular frequency and period time is:

ω=2∏f"

Do I say anything else? There is 2∏ in both equations, is that some sort of relationship?

Cheers,
Joel

The only other relation would be T=2π√(l/g), but generally you can leave it as that.

In the derivation for the periodic time, you get to a point where ω2= g/l and that ω=2π/T as per its definition.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top