How Far From the First Station Do Two Oppositely Accelerating Trains Meet?

AI Thread Summary
Two trains start from rest, 5.0 km apart, and accelerate towards each other at different rates: one at 2.5 m/s² and the other at 4.0 m/s². The initial calculations incorrectly assumed that the first train would travel the full distance of 5 km, leading to confusion about their meeting point. The correct approach involves setting up equations for each train's position over time and equating them to find the time and distance at which they meet. Ultimately, the meeting point is determined by solving for the displacement of each train relative to their starting positions, confirming that they will meet at a calculated distance from the first station.
OmniNewton
Messages
105
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Two trains start from rest from two stations 5.0 km apart and travel, on two parallel railroad tracks, in opposite directions. One train accelerates uniformly at 2.5 m/s^2 and the other has a constant acceleration of 4.0 m/s^2.
How far from the first station will they meet?


Homework Equations



1. d= at^2
2. v^2 = u^2+ 2ad
3. t= v-u/ a

The Attempt at a Solution


Train 1 relative to Train 2
Initial velocity = 0 m/s
Acceleration = 6.5 m/s^2
Displacement = 5000m

v^2 = u^2+ 2ad
v = Square root of u^2 + 2ad
v= Square root of 2ad
v= Square root of 2(6.5 m/s^2) (5000m)
v= Square root of 65000 m^2/s^2
v= + or - 255 m/s

t= v-u/ a
t= 255ms^-1/6.5m/s^-2
t= 39 seconds

Train 1

d= at^2 because initial velocity = 0
d= (2.5 ms^-1) (39 seconds)
d= 97.5m

Therefore they will meet 97.5m from the first station.

However this answer does not make sense to me because if I solve for distance with the other train it does not add to 5000m or 5.0 km. I do not know what I did wrong.

Thanks In Advanced
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF OmniNewton!

OmniNewton said:

Homework Statement



Two trains start from rest from two stations 5.0 km apart and travel, on two parallel railroad tracks, in opposite directions. One train accelerates uniformly at 2.5 m/s^2 and the other has a constant acceleration of 4.0 m/s^2.
How far from the first station will they meet?


Homework Equations



1. d= at^2
2. v^2 = u^2+ 2ad
3. t= v-u/ a

This bit in red is wrong. The actual equation is:
d = d0 + v0t + (1/2)at2

Where d0 and v0 are the initial position and speed respectively. If these are both zero, it's still d = (1/2)at2. You are missing the factor of 1/2.

OmniNewton said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Train 1 relative to Train 2
Initial velocity = 0 m/s
Acceleration = 6.5 m/s^2
Displacement = 5000m

v^2 = u^2+ 2ad
v = Square root of u^2 + 2ad
v= Square root of 2ad
v= Square root of 2(6.5 m/s^2) (5000m)
v= Square root of 65000 m^2/s^2
v= + or - 255 m/s

t= v-u/ a
t= 255ms^-1/6.5m/s^-2
t= 39 seconds

There is a fundamental conceptual error here. You are assuming that the first train travels 5 km. It doesn't. The situation is that the two trains start out 5 km apart and head towards each other along parallel tracks. Since they are approaching each other, they will meet somewhere in the middle of the two stations, and you have to figure out where and when this occurs.

In any case, you do not need this equation v2 = u2 + 2ad. The two trains will "meet" when their positions are the same. So, write down an expression for the position vs. time of train 1. Now write down an expression for the position vs. time of train 2 (hint: it does not have the same starting position, and the sign of its acceleration is opposite). Equate these two expressions, and solve for t. This gives you the time at which they meet. From this, you can get the position of each one.
 
It actually all worked out once I used that equation d= at^2/2

5000m worked because train 1 relative to train 2 equates to 5000m

train 1's displacement = x

train 2's displacement = 5000m - x

so ultimately

train 1's displacement relative to train 2 has to be 5000m.

Correct me if I am wrong however.

But thank you very much for the help you really helped me and it is very much appreciated :D

Thank You Very Much For The Welcome.
 
OmniNewton said:
It actually all worked out once I used that equation d= at^2/2

5000m worked because train 1 relative to train 2 equates to 5000m

train 1's displacement = x

train 2's displacement = 5000m - x

so ultimately

train 1's displacement relative to train 2 has to be 5000m.

Correct me if I am wrong however.

But thank you very much for the help you really helped me and it is very much appreciated :D

Thank You Very Much For The Welcome.

If it worked out, then I guess your math must have been right, but what you are *saying* is totally wrong. First of all, train 1's *position* is x1. Its displacement is its change in position. Train 2's position is x2 relative to its station (or 5000 - x2 relative to the first station). Their separation (the distance between them) is NOT 5000 m at any time other than t = 0. E.g. at t = 0, x1 = 0 and x2 = 5000, so their separation is x2 - x1 = 5000 m. But suppose at some later time, the first train has moved 100 m along the track, and the second has moved 400 m along the track (totally made up numbers). So, train1's position (and displacement) is 100 m. Train 2's position (measured relative to the first station) is 5000 - 400 = 4600 m. Train 2's displacement is 400 m. The separation between the trains ("relative displacement") is 4600 m - 100 m = 4500 m. So, you can see that their relative distance is NOT 5000 m after t = 0, since they are moving *towards* each other.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top