Relativistic at freeze out? Definition of HDM

AI Thread Summary
In a hot dark matter (HDM) scenario, there is a discussion about whether neutrinos were relativistic at freeze-out. The argument centers on the condition for relativistic travel, which requires energy to be much greater than mass (E >> m). It is noted that just before freeze-out, neutrinos have energy equal to the thermal energy of the universe, suggesting they are not relativistic at that moment. However, it is clarified that neutrinos decouple from thermal equilibrium while the universe is still hot, meaning they were indeed relativistic when they escaped. The current state of neutrinos, affected by cosmological redshifts, aligns their temperature closer to that of the cosmic microwave background.
cohen990
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Okay so in a HDM scenario, I have seen it described that the neutrinos were relativistic at freeze out. (If I could find it I would reference it.)

Is this a contradictory statement?

The condition for relativistic travel is E>>m but just before freezeout, the neutrino has energy equal to the thermal energy of the universe (as it is in thermal equilibrium). Since the particle freezes out when the energy of the universe \approx the mass of the particle, then just before freeze out the particle is not relativistic! Correct?

Anyway, thanks for your time,

Dan
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Since the particle freezes out when the energy of the universe ≈ the mass of the particle
Why? I don't think this is true.
 
cohen990 said:
Okay so in a HDM scenario, I have seen it described that the neutrinos were relativistic at freeze out. (If I could find it I would reference it.)

Is this a contradictory statement?

The condition for relativistic travel is E>>m but just before freezeout, the neutrino has energy equal to the thermal energy of the universe (as it is in thermal equilibrium). Since the particle freezes out when the energy of the universe \approx the mass of the particle, then just before freeze out the particle is not relativistic! Correct?

Anyway, thanks for your time,

Dan

I don't really know if this is what you asking, but if what you are talking about is something like the neutrino background of the universe (analogue to the CMB), then neutrinos 'decouple' (getting away from this thermal equilibrium soup) from matter when the universe was still incredibly hot. Therefore these neutrinos were relativistic when they escaped. But as of today, due to cosmological redshifts, their temperature is something around the CMB.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top