Relativistic Collision Effects on Speed, Mass

gsimo1234
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
To a moderator: this is a theoretical, concept-based question.

Say two balls of putty, moving relativistically near the speed of light, collide (although i understand this is not possible theoretically and realistically). They collide at a slight perpendicular displacement, instead of head-on, so that in the final state the stuck together system is rotating. Compared to the non-rotating head-on collision, how will this effect the final speed, and how will this effect the Mf' (final mass)? Imagine that you stop the lump from spinning, will its mass be great. less, or equal to Mf'?

Here is what I got out of this situation; Vf remains the same, since rotation does not affect the conservation of momentum. However, less "energy" goes into the mass conversion, so there is less mass. If we stop it from spinning, we do work on the system, adding this rotational energy into the system and the mass willl then be greater to the final mass.

I'm not sure if I'm understanding the theory correct.

P.S. Please don't say "it will vaporize" or "this is not possible"; Let's ASSUME that they stick together relativistically and also rotate, without vaporizing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If two colliding bodies attach to each other, the system mass is determined with their initial energies solely. It does not matter whether they rotate or not. In the frontal collision it is their atoms/molecules that will rotate/vibrate more.

If you stop the rotation, the mass will become smaller because you take away some energy from the system.
 
by looking at the equations of relativity, your answer actually does make sense; rotate or not, it will have the same final speed and thus same final mass! Thank you so much!

Can anyone confirm this?
 
Yes, you can always analyze the collision from the center of mass frame. In that frame if the final mass is spinning then it will have more energy and therefore more mass than an otherwise identical non-spinning mass. This energy and mass will come from the original mass energy of the system.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Back
Top